MENU

Sections

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
June 15, 2025

Cambridge Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Cambridge

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
2 News Homepage

How Did the Mid-Shore Community Foundation Donate almost $4 Million for the new Regional Hospital?

June 13, 2025 by The Spy
1 Comment

The Spy is sure that more than a few Spy readers blinked their eyes the other day when they read the headline that the Mid-Shore Community Foundation (MSCF) had committed almost $4 million to support the building of the new UM Shore Regional Health hospital project. It was inevitable that the region’s largest community foundation would make a meaningful donation to this much-needed facility, but the Spy wanted to know how the MSCF could make such a significant commitment when historically their largest “Strecch” grants were in the very low six figures.

Of course, we turned to Buck Duncan, president of MSCF, to answer that question, and it proved to be a lot more complicated than simply writing a check. The more one understands how Buck and his board assembled this commitment, the more one can appreciate the power and value of a community foundation, as well as the hundreds of its donors, who made such a meaningful gift possible.

And only Buck can make all of this such a good story to tell.

This video is approximately seven minutes in length. For more information about the Mid-Shore Community Foundation, please go here.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage

Reporter Notes: Another Case for the Cambridge Spy

June 6, 2025 by P. Ryan Anthony
2 Comments

In an age dominated by national headlines and global newsfeeds, The Cambridge Spy stands out as a vital resource for residents of Cambridge and the Mid-Shore. We have a deep commitment to the community and offer more than just news. We also deliver thoughtful, in-depth coverage that enriches civic life and celebrates local culture.

One of the Spy’s greatest strengths is its focus on issues that matter directly to the people of Cambridge. I could mention the many important stories the Spy’s talented contributors have produced, but I’ll just focus on some of the ones I’ve done.

To bring our readers local news updates, I’ve covered the Dorchester County Council and the Cambridge City Council; interviewed mayors, city commissioners, and city managers; and hosted video check-ins with the chief of police and the school superintendent.

I’ve provided insights into the economic life of our city through conversations with the Chamber of Commerce president and the owners of local businesses such as Four Eleven Kitchen and Free Spirit Threads. Additionally, I’ve kept the Spy’s readers informed of the latest on Cambridge Waterfront Development, Inc., and its Cambridge Harbor project.

Updates on Cannery Way, Cannery Park, and the Rail Trail project? Done those. How about plans for the Hearn Building, flood mitigation, or the land bank authority? Covered. The YMCA, Cambridge Association of Neighborhoods, and Moving Dorchester Forward? If you’re a regular reader, chances are you’re in the know about all that.

Equally important is the Spy’s dedication to the cultural life of the Eastern Shore. We do our best to amplify the voices of local artists, historians, and cultural institutions.

I have profiled the Richardson Maritime Museum, Baywater Animal Rescue, and the Pine Street Enrichment Program. My interviews with the executive director of the Dorchester Historical Society and representatives of the League of Women Voters highlighted venerable local stalwarts.

I’m very proud of my videos about sharpshooter Annie Oakley’s time in Cambridge, the Phillips Packing Company Strike of 1937, and the history of Handsell House. And speaking of history, the Spy has featured stories about the first Choptank River Bridge, pirates and smugglers, a silent movie star, the voting rights struggle, leading women and African Americans of Cambridge, and Christmas of long ago.

If I were to get into an overview of my weekly Cambridge Time Machine feature, this article would be twice as long. Suffice it to say that, through this coverage, we not only document but actively nurture the region’s creative identity.

In a media landscape where small-town stories are too often lost, The Cambridge Spy proves that local journalism still matters—and thrives—when done with purpose, intelligence, and heart. I hope you think so, too, and that you will help keep it going by supporting us financially.


P. Ryan Anthony
Senior Reporter
Cambridge Spy

Please make a donation here or by sending a personal check to the following:

The Cambridge Spy Fund
Mid-Shore Community Foundation
102 E. Dover Street
Easton, MD 21601

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, Habitat, Habitat Homepage, Habitat Portal Lead

Oh Never Mind: Homeland Security Removes Talbot and QAC from Sanctuary List

June 3, 2025 by Maryland Matters
Leave a Comment

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security over the weekend took down a public list of cities and jurisdictions that the Trump administration labeled as “sanctuary” cities, after a sharp rebuke from a group representing 3,000 sheriffs and local law enforcement.

On Saturday, National Sheriffs’ Association President Sheriff Kieran Donahue slammed the list as an “unnecessary erosion of unity and collaboration with law enforcement.”

“The completion and publication of this list has not only violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement, but it also has the potential to strain the relationship between Sheriffs and the White House administration,” Donahue said.

DHS published the list Thursday and it was unavailable by Sunday. It’s unclear when it was removed, but Internet archives indicate that Saturday was the last time the list was still active.

In a statement, DHS did not answer questions as to why the list was removed.

“As we have previously stated, the list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly,” according to a DHS spokesperson. “Designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, noncompliance with Federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens.”

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem on Fox News Sunday did not acknowledge that the list was taken down, but said some localities had “pushed back.”

“They think because they don’t have one law or another on the books that they don’t qualify, but they do qualify,” Noem said. “They are giving sanctuary to criminals.”

Local law enforcement aids in immigration enforcement by holding immigrants in local jails until federal immigration officials can arrive.

The creation of the list stems from Donald Trump’s executive order in April that required DHS to produce a list of cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration officials in enforcement matters, in order to strip federal funding from those local governments.

Those jurisdictions are often dubbed “sanctuary cities,” but immigration enforcement still occurs in the city — there’s just no coordination between the local government and the federal government.

The jurisdictions are often a target for the Trump administration and Republicans, who support the President Donald Trump campaign promise of mass deportations of people without permanent legal status.

Congressional Republicans in March grilled mayors from Boston, Chicago and Denver, on their cities’ immigration policies during a six-hour hearing before the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Local officials were puzzled by the list.

One law enforcement association in North Dakota questioned why several counties — Billings, Golden Valley, Grant, Morton, Ramsey, Sioux, and Slope — were listed as sanctuary jurisdictions because those areas cooperate with federal immigration officials.

In a statement, the North Dakota Sheriff’s and Deputies Association said the “methodology and criteria used to compile this list is unknown,” and there has been no communication from DHS “on how to rectify this finding.”

“The elected Sheriffs of these counties take strong objection with language in this release characterizing them as ‘deliberately and shamefully obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws endangering American communities,’” according to NDSDA.

“The North Dakota Sheriff’s and Deputies Association is working to gather more information regarding the lack of transparency and reasoning as to why the Department of Homeland Security did not fact check prior to incorrectly naming these North Dakota counties.”

Local advocacy groups also noted the problems with the DHS list.

“I assume they’ve removed (the list) because they were bombarded with complaints about inaccuracy and how and why these various jurisdictions got on the list,” Steven Brown, executive director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, said in an interview Monday.

According to the Internet Archive website Wayback Machine, the states, as well as the District of Columbia, that were on the list included Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington state and Wisconsin.

By Ariana Figueroa Christopher Shea and Amy Dalrymple contributed to this story. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage

Reporter’s Notebook: The Case for the Cambridge Spy by P. Ryan Anthony

June 2, 2025 by P. Ryan Anthony

Dear Cambridge Spy Readers,

For all its many challenges, Cambridge is an extraordinary city. It is rich in history, vibrant in culture, and full of people who care deeply about the community and the Eastern Shore in general.

Yet, we are in an era of shrinking local journalism. Recently, our county lost a venerable friend with the folding of the Dorchester Banner. This makes it more important than ever that we come together to preserve one of our most vital civic institutions: local news.

The Cambridge Spy exists for one reason—to serve this community. We cover stories that matter to you: city council decisions, local school developments, community leaders, arts and culture, history, and the issues shaping our shared future. Our mission is straightforward: to inform, engage, and give a voice to Cambridge. And that’s what I have been doing for the last two years.

But sadly, independent journalism isn’t free.

Unlike large, corporate media outlets, The Cambridge Spy operates without paywalls, subscriptions, or clickbait. We’re funded by community advertising, and every article and video we publish is made possible by those who understand that a strong, well-informed public is the foundation of a thriving town.

If you value thoughtful reporting, meaningful interviews, and honest storytelling that reflects the soul of Cambridge, consider supporting us.

Your financial contribution—no matter the size—helps us continue telling the stories that won’t be told anywhere else. It ensures that local voices remain heard, that power remains accountable, and that our community stays connected.

This is more than just journalism—it’s a public service. And it only works if we all take part.

P. Ryan Anthony
Senior Reporter
The Cambridge Spy

Please make a donation to keep The Cambridge Spy strong, independent, and focused on what matters most: you.  Here is the link to make a donation, or you can send a personal check to:

Cambridge Spy Fund 
Mid-Shore Community Foundation
102 East Dover Street 
Easton MD 21601 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, Habitat, Habitat Homepage, Habitat Portal Lead

Dorchester County Council Passes Annual Budget Without Cutting Tax Rebate

May 28, 2025 by P. Ryan Anthony
1 Comment

After enduring considerable community blowback over removing the municipal tax differentials for Cambridge and Hurlock, the Dorchester County Council hunkered down with County Manager Jerry Jones and his staff to revamp the intended county budget.

Essentially, the tax differential allows the county to give credit to the residents of the larger communities for services they also pay the towns for through taxes for such things as policing and road maintenance, along with what the county provides. Property owners in Cambridge and Hurlock have received the rebate since 2007.

The County Commissioners had considered eliminating the differential. It was one of several tax increases suggested in order to address the budget to address a $6.2 million budget deficit. At two Tuesday night meetings, members of the community spoke out against the proposed move.

On May 20, the Council passed the fiscal year 2026 budget with the differentials still intact. As a compromise, the county will instead raise real property taxes for all property owners by 3 cents. This will bring the overall tax rate to $1.03 per $100 of assessed value. Cambridge residents will pay 95.67 cents per $100, and Hurlock residents will pay 94.79 cents. Three cents is about $1.02 million for the county, explained Council President Lenny Pfeffer.

Unfortunately, the adjustments made to the budget included deferring all nonprofit funding until a later time. Board members of the Cambridge Empowerment Center told WBOC’s Lauren Miller they are worried that they won’t be able to run their full nine-week summer program for children ages 5 to 12 without the $30,000 they usually get from the county. They consider the program even more important since there will be no summer school to keep kids busy.

The Council has also reduced the number of capital projects they’ll be doing this year.

Commissioner William Nichols told the community members present that this was the worst budget he had seen in his 30 years on the Council.

A reported disconnect between the state capital and rural Maryland came up several times at the May 20 meeting. Commissioner Rob Kramer said he doesn’t think Annapolis has any hope in the rural area, but he also has no hope in Annapolis. Maryland Delegate Tom Hutchinson, who attended the meeting, agreed with the pessimistic sentiments of the council members. Before opening the floor for comments, Pfeffer asked that community members be active next year in letting Annapolis know that “Dorchester County cannot continue to take the economic hits it has been.”

The council ultimately was able to balance the county budget. However, Pfeffer told the Spy that he doesn’t know if they can afford to keep the differentials in place forever.

“The majority of Eastern Shore Counties do not offer any differential to their municipalities,” he said. “I recognize that the municipalities offer extra services to their citizens because of the increased demand of higher density populations, but the County often assists the towns with some of their services. I feel the future of keeping the differentials lies in direct correlation with any future push downs from the State and Federal Governments.”

The budget plan will be submitted to the state by month’s end and take effect July 1.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, Habitat, Habitat Homepage, Habitat Portal Lead

Moore to Veto Reparations Bill

May 18, 2025 by Maryland Matters
Leave a Comment

Gov. Wes Moore (D) announced Friday that he will veto the Reparations Commission bill that called for a study of historic inequality endured by African descendants in Maryland.

The veto of a reparations measure by the only sitting Black governor in the nation was included a list of vetoed bills, many of which called for summer study of an issue, typically the most innocuous type of legislation. The list of 23 bills was released late Friday afternoon by the governor’s office.

In one of his veto letters, Moore said the study bills were vetoed for financial reasons: The state’s current budget requires a hard look at “bills that create expensive and labor intensive studies,” Moore wrote.

“While such bills can be a first step to addressing complex issues and allow the signaling of support for an issue, the practice has become so commonplace that it is now a significant fiscal and staff burden on state government,” the veto letter said.

Sponsors began getting the news of the coming vetoes of their bills Friday afternoon, and chatter was widespread before the official announcement. Reparations was the most high-profile bill to be shot down, but others learned of the demise of bills to study the effects of climate change and to look at the impact of data centers on the state, among other issues.

Moore’s list also includes a bill in the energy package backed by House and Senate leadership, which created a Strategic Energy Planning Office focused on the state’s energy needs.

Reaction was swift, and in some cases angry, from lawmakers, who were already discussing veto overrides.

“The governor is my friend. I think a lot of him, but I am very disappointed in him today,” said Sen. C. Anthony Muse (D-Prince George’s), who sponsored the Senate version of the reparations bill. “I’m very disappointed that something like this, that Black communities across the country have been asking for, it’s turned down in our state.”

List of vetoed bills

Gov. Wes Moore (D) announced Friday that he will veto 23 bills passed by the 2025 General Assembly — more than in the previous two years combined, when he vetoed 13 and four, respectively. This year’s vetoes included some high-profile proposals, including a bill to create reparations study commission and another to look at the impact of data centers.

  • SB980: Natural Resources – Maryland Heritage Areas Authority – Funding and Grants

  • HB56/SB177: Local Food Purchasing

  • HB0328: State Lottery – Instant Ticket Lottery Machines – Veterans’ and Fraternal Organizations

  • HB0482: Occupational Licensing and Certification – Criminal History – Predetermination Review Process

  • HB1116: Public Safety – State Clearinghouse for Missing Persons

  • SB655: AI Evidence Pilot

  • SB149/HB128: “RENEW Study” Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation – Total Assessed Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Study and Reports

  • SB691/HB333: Healthcare Ecosystem Cyber Work Group

  • SB909/HB1037: Energy Resource Adequacy Planning Act

  • Operating Funds: Fund Study by Comptroller Required by SB149

  • Operating Funds: MSDE Three Positions to Assist LEAs with Cybersecurity

  • HB384/SB157: Disability Service Animal Program

  • SB121: Vehicle Laws – Noise Abatement Monitoring Systems Pilot Program – Inspection and Extension

  • SB168: Confined Aquatic Disposal Cells – Construction – Moratorium

  • SB0227: Workers’ Compensation – Payment From Uninsured Employers’ Fund – Revisions

  • HB193/SB219: Uninsured Employers’ Fund – Assessments and Special Monitor

  • SB0972: Anne Arundel County – Board of License Commissioners – Alterations

  • SB503/HB481: Washington County – Board of License Commissioners – Membership

  • HB1316: Primary and Secondary Education – Youth-Centric Technology and Social Media Resource Guide

  • SB116/HB270: Data Center Impact Study

  • SB0455: Security Guard Agencies – Special Police Officers – Application for Appointment

  • HB628: Highways – Sidewalks and Bicycle Pathways – Construction and Reconstruction

  • SB587: State Government – Maryland Reparations Commission

In his reparations veto letter, the governor wrote he appreciated the leadership of the Legislative Black Caucus, but added, “I strongly believe now is not the time for another study. Now is the time for continued action that delivers results for the people we serve.” He noted that Maryland has launched several commissions and study groups in the last 25 years, including the Maryland Lynching Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission to Coordinate the Study, Commemoration and Impact of Slavery’s History and Legacy in Maryland.

But House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones (D-Baltimore County) said in a statement that as the first Black woman to serve as speaker, and “the niece of an original plaintiff who laid the foundation for Brown v. Board of Education,” she carries “a deep and personal understanding of how our past is not some distant chapter.”

“Reconciling the pain and injustice of the past is our moral obligation and essential to progress,” Jones wrote.

She said she was proud of the work done by the House this year, adding “the work is not done.”

“I remain committed to working alongside all our partners to continue righting historical inequities,” Jones wrote.

David Schuhlein, a spokesperson for Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City), said “the Senate will closely evaluate each veto from the Governor’s Office and have more details on possible action in the near future.”

Sen. Katie Fry Hester (D-Howard and Montgomery) sponsored the strategic energy office legislation, which passed the Senate on a 43-3 vote.

“I am surprised by the Governor’s veto, especially because we worked closely with the Public Service Commission on this legislation,” she said in a statement. “I look forward to better understanding his rationale and will work with leadership in the Legislature to determine next steps.”

Moore cited the bill’s fiscal note, which estimated the cost at $4.4 million to $5.3 million annually, for an office he said overlapped with other state agencies. “This cost would ultimately be passed along to Maryland ratepayers at a time when we are actively working to limit their burden, not add to it,” Moore wrote.

Hester also sponsored the RENEW Act, which would have commissioned a study from the comptroller’s office on the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in the state. It was a milder alternative to the original language, which would have called for a system to make businesses that extract fossil fuels pay fees to mitigate the effects of climate change.

“I think a study is a very reasonable next step, and the money was allocated in the budget,” Hester said. “This is very shortsighted, because this is a bill that will eventually save taxpayers money.”

The bill was to be funded mostly by $500,000 from the Strategic Energy Investment Fund, which is fueled by “alternative compliance payments” that utilities pay when they have not purchased enough renewable energy to comply with state mandates. That fund has ballooned in recent years with an influx of payments, including $318 million in fiscal 2024.

Climate advocates were angered by the move. Mike Tidwell, founder and director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, called the governor’s veto of the RENEW study “unforgivable.”

“I will make sure that voters in the state never forget what he’s done with this veto,” Tidwell said, adding that the governor’s office expressed no reservations about the bill as recently as mid-March.

The veto was “inconceivable,” given that Maryland has thousands of miles of shoreline vulnerable to climate change, and the $500,000 study could have paved the way toward collecting what Tidwell said could ultimately be billions of dollars in compensatory payments from fossil fuel companies.

“His math doesn’t add up. His political calculus is arguably even worse, because turning his back on Marylanders suffering from climate change today is an enormously politically damaging act,” Tidwell said.

Sen. Karen Lewis Young (D-Frederick) said she heard from the governor’s team Friday that her bill, studying the potential financial, environmental and energy effects of data centers in Maryland would be among the vetoes. In Frederick, development of an expansive Quantum Loophole campus has been underway for years, prompting Lewis Young’s interest in the subject.

“I’m really disappointed that, given what a big topic this is for the state — and in particular for my county — that we wouldn’t proceed with a study,” Lewis Young said.

Lewis Young said she was surprised to learn of the veto, especially given that the governor’s team did not express any reservations about the bill or its cost during the legislative session. The report was to cost about $502,000, with funds pulled from the Maryland Department of the Environment, the Maryland Energy Administration and the University System of Maryland, according to its fiscal note.

More economical still was the reparations bill: Versions that failed in previous years had price tags around $1 million, but the version on the governor’s desk this year was only expected to cost $54,500. The bill called for most of the work to be done by existing state employees or by researchers at Morgan State University, one of the state’s four historically black colleges and universities.

The bill’s supporters have pointed out repeatedly that the measure does not require any payments or support. It only calls for study of historic inequality suffered by African descendants, and recommendations for future action, if any.

“It’s not as though it was going to do something. It’s a study,” Muse said Friday evening. “When have we known a study to cause a veto? At the end of the study, nothing else has been done, except we studied it. I don’t understand it. I will not understand it.”

Advocates rallied in Annapolis a week ago, urging the governor to sign the bill, which had the backing of the Legislative Black Caucus. The caucus released a statement to express “deep disappointment” in the governor’s decision and to say the “legislature will have a final say” when lawmakers meet to consider veto overrides.

“At a time when the White House and Congress are actively targeting Black communities, dismantling diversity initiatives and using harmful coded language, Governor Moore had a chance to show the country and the world that here in Maryland we boldly and courageously recognize our painful history and the urgent need to address it,” the caucus said in a statement Friday evening.

“Instead, the State’s first Black governor chose to block this historic legislation that would have moved the state toward directly repairing the harm of enslavement,” the statement said.

But the veto had some defenders: Larry Gibson, who wrote a letter to the Baltimore Banner on the issue this week, agreed with Moore that another study is not what’s needed.

“We must use this opportunity to maximize this benefit with some degree of urgency. Kicking the can down the road with another study that produces a report … is just wasting a missed opportunity to get real progress done,” Gibson said Friday.

Gibson, who will retire this month after 50 years teaching at the University of Maryland Francis Carey School of Law, declined to offer specific suggestions, but he said advocacy groups that deal with topics such as housing, law enforcement and education are better situated to provide solutions that may or may not need legislative approval.

“They’ve got ideas and things that can be done by the administration without legislation. Push for and demand that they be done now,” he said.

The bill called for the creation of a commission that would assess specific federal, state and local policies from 1877 to 1965, the post-Reconstruction and Jim Crow eras that “led to economic disparities based on race, including housing, segregation and discrimination, redlining, restrictive covenants, and tax policies.”

The all-volunteer commission would also have examined how public and private institutions may have benefited from those policies, and would then recommend appropriate reparations, which could include statements of apology, monetary compensation, social service assistance, business incentives or child care costs.

The 24-member commission would have had to deliver a preliminary report of recommendations by Jan. 1, 2027, to explain any findings, and a final report by Nov. 1 of that year.

Maryland is one of just a handful of states that have passed legislation to study reparations, including California, Illinois, New York and Colorado.

By Christine Condon, William J. Ford and Bryan P. Sears

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage

Maryland Loses Coveted AAA Bond Rating

May 15, 2025 by Maryland Matters
Leave a Comment

Maryland lost its treasured “triple triple-A” bond rating Wednesday, when a key bond-rating agency downgraded its assessment of the state’s creditworthiness to Aa1.

The move by Moody’s ends more than three decades in which Maryland held the highest bond rating from the three rating agencies: Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch.

Moody’s had given Maryland an Aaa rating every year since 1973 — until Wednesday. The rating agency also downgraded half a dozen other state borrowing programs in its report.

In its reasoning for the downgrade, Moody’s said Maryland continues to have a “wealthy and diverse economy,” solid financial planning and that officials had recently addressed budget problems “through a combination of tax increases and restraints on expenditures.” But those were not enough to offset concerns about looming financial challenges, the report said.

“The downgrade was driven by economic and financial underperformance compared to Aaa-rated states, which is expected to continue given the state’s heightened vulnerability to shifting federal policies and employment, and its elevated fixed costs,” Moody’s wrote in its report.

Prior to Wednesday’s announcement, Maryland was one of 14 states to have the highest rating from the three major agencies — Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poors.

In a forceful response to the downgrade, the state’s top five Democrats — Gov. Wes Moore, Senate President Bill Ferguson (Baltimore City), House Speaker Adrienne Jones (Baltimore County), Comptroller Brook Lierman and Treasurer Dereck Davis — laid the blame on the White House doorstep of Republican President Donald Trump

“To put it bluntly, this is a Trump downgrade. Over the last one hundred days, the federal administration’s decisions have wreaked havoc on the entire region, including Maryland,” their joint statement said.

“Thousands of federal workers are losing their jobs. Actual and proposed cuts to everything from health care to education will continue to exact an incalculable toll on Maryland and states across the country,” the statement said.

But Maryland Republicans said warnings about the state’s financial problems came well before Trump, and said the downgrade should be a signal that the state cannot tax its way out of problems anymore.

“This is Moody’s saying that Maryland’s propensity to raise taxes is not enough any more,” Senate Minority Leader Stephen S. Hershey Jr. (R-Upper Shore) said Wednesday.

“People can move. They can work in other states,” he said. “They (Moody’s) are looking at the potential for economic growth in the state and it’s not enough.”

House Minority Leader Jason C. Buckel (R-Allegany) pushed back on the suggestion that it’s “a Trump downgrade.” He pointed to warnings from fiscal analysts in November and again in January of billions in structural budget gaps driven by higher spending on Medicaid, child care subsidies and, in later years, the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future education reforms.

Last year, Moody’s itself cited “escalating expenditures in education and healthcare, combined with elevated retirement benefit liabilities” when it reaffirmed the state’s Aaa bond rating, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. Wednesday’s downgrade “should come as no surprise to anyone” who follows the state budget, Buckel said.

“This was well before President Trump’s reelection and before any federal retrenchment. Foisting the blame anywhere but at the feet of the excessive spending championed by Maryland’s Democratic party is, at best, disingenuous,” Buckel said in a statement.

Decades without a downgrade

Besides Moody’s, which gave Maryland an Aaa rating in 1973, Standard & Poor’s first rated Maryland Aaa in 1961 and Fitch has given it that ranking since 1993.

Maryland maintained its Aaa rating from Moody’s through five recessions — including the Great Recession — the 2013 federal budget sequestration, and the COVID-19 pandemic. But Trump’s approach in his first 100 days, focused on slashing federal spending and employment and moving to wipe out entire programs or agencies, has rattled that confidence.

A triple-A rating means the state pays the lowest rates when it sells bonds to fund public projects. The downgrade means the state — and taxpayers — could  pay more in interest on the money the state borrows.

The next bond sale is scheduled for June 11.

It is not yet clear if the shift by one agency will increase the state’s interest rate or decrease or eliminate bond premiums — fees bond buyers pay the state in return for higher interest rates and a guarantee that the bonds will not be called for specific time periods. Premiums can be used to offset the higher rates the state pays, but that upfront cash has been used in the past for other purposes.

The downgrade is a blow to Democrats who for years have pointed to the state’s high credit ratings as a symbol of strong fiscal management. For others, it was seen as a sign the rating agencies were confident in a willingness among Maryland’s leaders — mostly Democrats — to raise taxes to pay its debts.

The rating downgrade was not wholly unexpected.

The warnings were there

When Moody’s last year reaffirmed the state’s AAA rating but lowered the state’s outlook from stable to negative, it cited concerns about looming structural deficits driven by programs like the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future.

The 2024 report noted the state’s high costs but relatively stable personal income tax base that was bolstered by federal employment and its proximity to the District of Columbia.

But Moody’s expressed concerns then about Maryland’s pension liabilities, and “above average debt burden.” The agency also worried about Maryland’s “vulnerability to swings in federal spending.”

Last year’s rating and negative outlook incorporated the “difficulties Maryland will face to achieve balanced financial operations in coming years without sacrificing service delivery goals or increasing the tax burden on individual and corporate taxpayers.”

Moody’s analysts warned then that a downgrade could come if there was further economic deterioration that resulted “in deficits, fund transfers and reserve draws.” Analysts also raised concerns about an “insufficient plan” to quickly replenish reserve funds or reach a structural budget balance.

Cuts to federal jobs or the federal government’s “role in the state’s economy” might also cause a downgrade, Moody’s wrote in its 2024 report.

Administration officials earlier this year expressed concern about a potential downgrade, but thought that solving the state’s immediate financial concerns — more than $3 billion in structural deficits in fiscal 2026, and a nearly equal amount the following year — would satisfy the rating agency and protect Maryland’s credit rating.

External pressures come to bear

But as lawmakers and administration officials were negotiating cuts, cost shifts and $1.6 billion in taxes and fees, Moody’s issued another warning report. The March report listed Maryland as the state at highest risk for economic problems as the Trump administration slashed agency budgets and jobs.

The budget finalized by lawmakers reduced general fund spending — the portion paid directly by Maryland taxpayers — by $400 million, despite overall growth of about 1% when all funding sources are included.

That included more than $1 billion in combined one-time general fund actions and another $800 million in transfers from various accounts to the general fund budget, in addition to tax and fee increases.

The spending plan also eased the burden on the state by shifting some costs, including teacher pensions and costs for property tax assessments, to local governments.

The result was the elimination of the projected structural deficits for fiscal 2026 and 2027.

But those deficits return the following year and grow to more than $3 billion by 2030, according to projections included in a presentation to the bond rating agencies. All of those deficits are related to expected education spending that is part of the Blueprint plan.

Officials told the rating agencies that 70% of the costs could be controlled by the state.

Soon after the 2025 session ended, Moody’s issued a report downgrading the credit rating of the District of Columbia from AAA to Aa1. The firm cited impacts from federal workforce reductions as well as weakening demand for commercial real estate.

“I think a lot of us looked at that report and thought you could replace DC with Maryland because Maryland is going through all the same challenges,” said David Turner, a Moore spokesperson.

Presenting a united front

Last week, the state hosted all three bond rating agencies as part of its annual reviews ahead of the state’s June bond sale. Only Moody’s came to Maryland for face-to-face meetings; Fitch and Standard & Poor’s representatives met with state officials virtually.

Typically, those meetings include the state treasurer, comptroller, budget secretary, the director of the Bureau of Revenue Estimates and legislative analysts. But Moore, Ferguson, Jones took the rare step of meeting in person with Moody’s last Tuesday. The three also made brief comments as part of a united front in hopes of retaining the highest credit rating.

The three did not attend meetings with the other two firms. A spokesman for the governor acknowledged the concerns about a bond rating hit from Moody’s.

As a part of the presentation to the agencies, officials highlighted actions taken this year on the budget as well as the creation of a committee to track the effects of federal cuts on Maryland.

Layoff notices spiked in February and March, but “normalized in April,” according to a copy of the presentation obtained by Maryland Matters. Monthly federal employment showed no declines; unemployment claims showed no increase.

But state officials also acknowledged the chance of a delayed effect, as pending federal lawsuits over Trump actions are resolved. Another potential effect could come from employees who took buyouts and may apply for unemployment in the fall.

Officials told all three bond-rating agencies that the state was seeing stronger than projected income tax withholding. While initial projections for fiscal 2025 called for 5.5% growth, income tax collections were up 9’% through March, the presentation said.

The joint Democratic statement said leaders met with Moody’s “to discuss our collective work protecting the full faith and credit of the State of Maryland.”

“Together, we turned a deficit into a surplus, gave the middle class tax relief while still raising critical revenue through strategic tax reforms, and reduced spending by over $2 billion – the largest amount that’s been cut in a Maryland state budget in 16 years.” their statement said. “Maryland’s creditworthiness has only been strengthened by our collective work on this budget.”

Fitch and Standard & Poors are expected to release their own ratings in advance of the June bond sale. Officials have not expressed a heightened concern for a downgrade from either of the remaining agencies.

By Bryan P. Sears

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage

County Council Highlights: It’s All about the Budget

May 12, 2025 by P. Ryan Anthony
Leave a Comment

At the May 6 meeting of the Dorchester County Council, many people—public officials and citizens—approached the lectern to discuss the county’s budget and proposed tax changes.

Folks like Cambridge Mayor Lajan Cephas asked the council to reconsider a plan to remove a tax differential on county properties. Robert Aaron and Michelle Bourque offered warnings about possible housing cost hikes. Sharon Smith asked the council for more transparency, including about its budget, the published version of which is scant on details compared with other local governments.

Mary Ann Benson accused the council of potentially fraudulent activity, and Cambridge City Council president Sputty Cephas told the commissioners straight out that they looked like “they could care less” about what was being said. There was occasional tension in the air, such as when former Cambridge Mayor Cleveland Rippons harangued the council members, as well as frequent applause from the audience.

A common theme among the speakers was the hope that the county commissioners would reflect on what was said and consider their actions carefully.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, Habitat, Habitat Homepage, Habitat Portal Lead

From and Fuller: The Impact of Poll Ratings on Trump and his new Digital Coin

May 1, 2025 by Al From and Craig Fuller
Leave a Comment

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, Al and Craig discuss the low approval ratings for Donald Trump following his first 100 days in office. Al and Craig also discuss the ethics and legality of the Trump Coin, a product of the World Liberty Financial, 605 of which is owned by the Trump family. Al refers to Steve Rattner’s piece in the New York Times and Craig references the newspaper’s recent article on the curent president’s secret deals and foreign investments.

This video podcast is approximately 24 minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

 

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, From and Fuller, Spy Highlights

Four Eleven Kitchen’s Amanda Kidd on Succeeding in Food & Hospitality

April 28, 2025 by P. Ryan Anthony
Leave a Comment

When about a hundred people gathered on September 12, 2024, for the grand opening of Four Eleven Kitchen at the Packing House in Cambridge, founder Amanda Kidd said, “Food is one of the things that drops all barriers.” This is something she witnessed first-hand as a child in Washington, DC. As she told the Star Democrat‘s Maggie Trovato last August, the foods made by her neighbors allowed her glimpses into different cultures.

That inspired her to get into the food and hospitality industry. Eventually, she started Beat the Rush food delivery service, and now she has Four Eleven, a shared-use professional kitchen facility and educational engagement space where nascent food businesses (“foodpreneurs”) can develop menus, experiment with dishes, and nurture customers while learning hospitality skills as well as how to comply with food-service guidelines.

The Spy recently met Kidd at Four Eleven to discuss her background and success with the new business.

You’ve been in food and hospitality since you were a teenager. What did you do?

KIDD: I mean, everything from amusement park hospitality, worked at Kings Dominion. So, that’s like the top tier you can get as a teenager. But I mean, worked in, I call them three-star, like Tropical Smoothies, Moe’s, those type of establishments. And then later elevated to Best Western Inn where I worked in banqueting and worked as a hostess, grew my passion and desire for food and hospitality even further by working alongside the chefs there.

How old were you when you decided to get into that? When you knew that that’s what you wanted to do.

KIDD: It wasn’t a “knew that I wanted to do” thing. It was something I’ve always gravitated to. It’s like a safe place, so it wasn’t a dedicated career path, if that makes sense.

Just kind of happened. It was just an instinct.

KIDD: I mean, it was an area that I felt comfortable in.

Why is that?

KIDD: Because I always had a passion for food. So, growing up in the kitchen with my grandparents all the time, whether it was family dinner, holiday dinner, a gathering, we were always in the kitchen, always cooking. So, it was just a place of comfort for me.

Where did you go to school?

KIDD: So, I started at Liberty University and then took a pause, actually ended up going to massage school for a period of time, while working, figuring out what I wanted to do. But then I went back to school, to University of Phoenix online, and then I took some classes here at Chesapeake [College], as well.

Was that after you had a family of your own? Because that’s usually when you do it online, because it’s a necessity.

KIDD: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

And you’ve owned other businesses in this arena before. Like Beat the Rush.

KIDD: Yeah, so Beat the Rush is a more concierge hospitality side of things, more so than the actual food side.

Why’d you decide to do that?

KIDD: So, started out, had family needs that I saw other individuals experiencing the same thing, and whether it was limited transportation to get the foods and the essential things that they needed in their homes, which is probably a good percentage of Americans these days. But our community here and then also my personal family at the time–my mom was battling cancer. So, she had those same challenges as getting foods, fresh foods, things into the home. So, Beat the Rush was a concept that she and I talked about for a long time based off of what we saw her challenges, other challenges of those that were sharing the treatment rooms with her. You know, they talked about a lot of their challenges.

And so it was always a desire of ours to expand it to where it could help multiple communities, which is still in the works. So, even though we paused for a little bit to get Four Eleven off the ground, because a lot of what Beat the Rush embodied, which was supporting local producers of food, farmers, we found that there was a need. There was a need for the local caterers, local farmers, and being able to produce their foods. They kept getting turned away from the health department for certain items that they needed, that they desire to produce.

Can you explain that?

KIDD: Because they didn’t have commercial kitchen access. And so, Four Eleven Kitchen bridges that gap to provide the commercial kitchen access. So, now they can continue to grow their business and scale it the way that they decided to. But, with Beat the Rush, it was more than just based off of a need. It is a challenge for a lot of small businesses to do all the things in their business.

So, Beat the Rush embodied a department–we were logistics, concierge, hospitality. We embodied a department for that. Some business owners could not fathom creating, having their own departments, not starting out at the gate. So, a lot of people that we serve were startups just like us. So, we believe in community. We believe in collaboration. And so, collaboration allows us to leverage each other to grow.

So, how does Four Eleven Kitchen work?

KIDD: So, Four Eleven Kitchen, we are, I would say a food and hospitality incubator. So, we give the support to the foodpreneurs by providing them assistance with business development, community, and access to commercial kitchen. We also provide access to resources, subject matter experts, industry, connections that can help them to further grow their business; but, even where they are right now, help them to maintain until they get to that place of momentum and ready to really grow and scale. A lot of what people miss is community because, I don’t know if you have any insight of the food industry, but it can be pretty cutthroat and where there’s a lot of competitive behavior. That’s something that I believe has kind of crushed the industry, because it’s so much competitiveness versus collaboration.

And a lot of times, like, we have the two users today: Fusion Eats, they are soul and savory food, but Blue’s Flowers is bakery sweet decadent. So, one can complement the other. And you can have days where you can have pop-up events, where everyone’s able to receive support, and the community can do just like what they do when they go to Wawa. They go to Wawa, they get a burger and a brownie, you’re still getting from two separate vendors, and a lot of people don’t really see that connection. So, bringing that aspect and putting that before the community, showing them, like, there is collaboration there, this is how it works together. So, I believe Four Eleven Kitchen will be that bridge and that barrier-breaking at the same time, breaking the barriers of the mind that “Okay, I can patronize two separate food businesses,” but then bridging the gap to “this is how we do it.” And that’s through Four Eleven.

So, one of the things that we also do–and I mentioned the mind. So, we have an initiative called Feed the People. And so, Feed the People is an initiative that embodies education and also actual feeding of people. So, we’re feeding minds and feeding bellies. And so, we have programming that is actually launching this summer that we have cooking classes. And I don’t want to say “cooking classes” in the culinary and certification-type cooking classes, but more of a community engagement, community development-style of cooking classes where people in the community can come together. There can be, let’s just say cookie decorating, learn how to decorate cookies, learn how to–and something fun you can do with your family, your friends, your neighbors, co-workers. Organization groups can come in and do it together.

But then, the other aspect of it is teaching people how to feed themselves. So, giving them those soft skills, showing them that it’s not like you have to go get a degree to learn how to make good food, how to make healthy food, how to make good foods, comfort foods that you love in a healthy way. So, it’s really kind of like playing off of those type of opportunities. And then we have an initiative, a part of that initiative is our urban farm. And that urban farm is going to support the learning aspect–getting in, making the mistakes, learning the intricacies of gardening and farming from different facilitators such as University of Maryland Extension Master Gardeners, local farmers, food educators who we will partner with to provide access to that information.

Where will this urban farming take place?

KIDD: Lincoln Terrace and Douglas Street. Are you familiar with that, off of Washington Street? So, in that corridor there, they actually just started building some new homes back there with Habitat. And then the, I think it’s [Department of Housing and Community Development], are building some homes as well back there. So, it’s a kind of our concept of it piggybacked off of the Habitat being in that community because they were beautifying and making creative spaces there. And so, we actually started with Habitat donating the property to the city, and the city and us are coming into a partnership to be able to occupy that as an urban farm. So, it’s a community effort.

The educational part of it, or helping them with their business plan or whatever. Where does that take place? Like, do you sit down at a desk?

KIDD: Yeah. I mean, depending on their schedules, we would sit down face-to-face and be able to do it, but then we can do it virtually, as well. A lot of the foodpreneurs, they do hold other careers. So, it’s based off of their scheduling and whatever works for them.

How many active clients do you have at the moment?

KIDD: Active we have, I wanna say six, but it can fluctuate as far as, because we have non-member use. So, we have members and non-members. So, in memberships I would say six. But, as far as use, it fluctuates this month depending on rental needs.

Your rental prices, they were pretty reasonable. What I saw on your website, it seemed pretty reasonable.

KIDD: Yeah. We really are trying to keep that low startup for them, depending on where they’re at depends on what tiers they take on, and they’re able to fluctuate through those tiers as they adjust in their business and learn their business model.

You had a quotation from Maya Angelou on your Events page: “Nothing works unless you do.” What does that mean to you?

KIDD: So, we can have a thought and we can have a concept and an idea, but until we actually put our hands to it, until we do it, it doesn’t work. And even when doing it, sometimes we find that there are things that need to be adjusted. But when you stop because of the adjustments, then you stop all of the progress, all of the potential. So, it must continue. The work must continue. You must continue to do it. Even if there’s a challenge, even if there’s a hiccup, something that you didn’t foresee, it’s best to just navigate. You know what you can learn about it to kind of pivot or readjust and then continue on, but it won’t work unless you do.

What would your mom say about your success at this point?

KIDD: Man, so, I believe she would say, “I knew you could do it.” Yeah.

She had a lot of faith in you.

KIDD: Yes, yeah, I believe she could say, I mean, “You can do it.” And she, like, even up until her passing, she kept saying “Start the business, start the business.” I actually didn’t start any of my businesses until two years after she passed.

But she was in on planning Beat the Rush.

KIDD: She was. I mean, she was the prototype, it was because of her life and what she was experiencing. You know, Dad working two jobs at the time, probably three–didn’t know about the third one until, like, later on. Parents do what they have to do to keep the families afloat. And it was always a scheduling, like scheduling to get to the store to then prepare. We had sports and you had other family activities and life happening, and it’s like trying to get to the store. And we were at the very beginning of when Giant started Peapod. So, like, that’s when all that stuff was navigating.

And I was away at school and learned that Mom was sick. And it was like, “Mom, I can’t get you food.” Like, “I don’t know how to get you food.” And she was like, “You should start the business.” I was like, “What do you mean?” Like, that wasn’t a concept to me. Like, start a business. Like, we never talked about starting a business. And I didn’t actually get into business school until after she said start the business. And I was just like, I need to know what she’s talking about because this doesn’t make sense. But she was the prototype. She was the flame, the lighter fluid to the flame. She was all of that. And she’s what keeps me going. My kids also keep me going. My husband keeps me going, and those that have a need keep me going. So, if there’s a need, I’m going to keep going.

You officially opened here September 12th.

KIDD: But we’ve been an organization since 2022. … It’s been several years in the making just to get here. But even prior to that, this kitchen concept, Four Eleven, the name hadn’t been birthed yet, but the kitchen concept had been in our original business plan. So we knew that our foodpreneurs were going to need space to work out of if we were going to continue to have a thriving catering community.

There’s so many caterers, so many different food providers, food service providers, whether it’s meal prepping, whether it’s baked goods, whether it’s food products that we have in our community that we love so much. They need kitchen space, and a lot of it cannot be made in their homes. And the regulations, they have a limitation to what can be prepared in home and actually be sold for retail. So, we feel that that gap of when they hit that limitation and they’re able to then come here and prepare.

What does it feel like to blaze trails and solve problems?

KIDD: It’s, like, you pinch yourself–like, that’s me. Like, that’s what I’m doing. To me, it’s like I’m just waking up and doing what’s inside of me to do. But like, people like yourself that put the title of trailblazer or groundbreaking or things like that–it’s not something that I really think about. So, I mean, it’s definitely humbling to know that I have been given a vision and be able to innovate in a way that can help others along the way. So, it’s really an honor to be able to do it all.

For more information, visit the website.

Thanks to Debra R. Messick (Talbot Spy) and Tom McCall (Star Democrat) for supplementary material.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 2 News Homepage, Habitat, Habitat Homepage, Habitat Portal Lead

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 42
  • Next Page »

Wash College

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Cambridge
  • Commerce
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Food & Garden
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • News
  • Point of View
  • Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Contact Us
  • COVID-19: Resources and Data

© 2025 Spy Community Media. | Log in