MENU

Sections

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
December 31, 2025

Cambridge Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Cambridge

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
3 Top Story Point of View Howard

Out and About (Sort of): Passage Across the Big Creek by Howard Freedlander

November 3, 2020 by Howard Freedlander
Leave a Comment

Life has its passages, some more monumental than others. As of today, my wife Liz and I own an apartment in a retirement community in Annapolis overlooking the Chesapeake Bay (if you look closely enough).

Our move was originally scheduled for the past Friday. However, a major snafu by a New York bank caused the postponement of our settlements in Easton and Annapolis and hence our move. We become Annapolis residents on Thursday.

As both Liz and I said last week in “exit” interviews conducted expertly by Dave Wheelan, editor-publisher of the Chestertown, Cambridge and Talbot Spies, we are moving to be near family after 44 years living in a place that we have loved, and where we have set down deep roots. Our passage is geographic and emotional.

BayWoods of Annapolis is a continuing care retirement community. We will enjoy independent living until we can’t. We have accepted our increasing age and the desire—and maybe the need—to be near family as we grow older and infirmed.

These words do not flow easily.

On the one hand, it seems illogical to leave a place where we have established personal, professional and medical relationships. Friendships and comfortable surroundings contribute to pleasant living and mental well-being.

Why leave what satisfies your soul and gladdens your heart?

On the other hand, we will be able to spend more time with grandchildren, 10 and nearly 8, our youngest daughter and son-in-law and a sister-in-law. We will be 45 minutes closer to our eldest daughter, who lives in northern Baltimore County. The warmth of family caring has driven our decision-making.

What amuses me as we begin our last chapter of life, we will be living in a 1,380-square-foot apartment as if we were newlyweds. Instead of accumulating material items as one does in laying the foundation for years of nesting, we have downsized in ways that we never would have envisioned.

An inevitable aspect of this process is grieving. We are leaving one phase of our lives for another, realizing our years are diminishing on Planet Earth. Reality demands honesty and determination. 

Giving in and giving up are not positive actions. Moving forward despite changed circumstances makes sense to me.

We will become part of a small community inhabited by some folks ambulating with the help of walkers and canes (I have one). BayWoods has no resemblance to a youth hostel. Women predominate. Reasons are obvious to anyone who studies actuarial tables. 

I will continue to write for the Spy group, hoping I can observe and comment from the perspective of a longtime Shoreman and a new resident of our capital city. Readers will judge the results.

While I will keep looking east, where I’ve spent nearly 59 percent of my life, I will examine issues in Annapolis and Anne Arundel County that might relate to the Mid-Shore. To no one’s surprise, I will stay attuned to the political machinations entwined with the proposed building of the third Bay Bridge span and its impact on the Shore.

In two years we will have a gubernatorial election, in which I’m keenly interested. Who will vie with Comptroller Peter Franchot, an already declared candidate, for the Democratic nomination? Who will run for the GOP nomination and try to succeed the wildly popular Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican leader in a heavily Democratic state?

Neither my wife nor I will become mushrooms in what we understand is an active, engaged community. We will participate in the Annapolis community as long as we can be productive–and retain our ties to the Shore.

We are not entering a convent. We will not hide behind our chronological ages and decline to enter the mix. Hibernation does not fit our DNAs.

This arduous passage involves leaving behind a town and county filled with bountiful memories and wonderful people. We have an additional chapter to enjoy. 

The Chesapeake Bay will remain our anchor. We will scan it daily, understanding it represents the heartbeat of Maryland. It may separate the shores, but the health of this estuary and its numerous tributaries affects all of us.

Columnist Howard Freedlander retired in 2011 as Deputy State Treasurer of the State of Maryland. Previously, he was the executive officer of the Maryland National Guard. He also served as community editor for Chesapeake Publishing, lastly at the Queen Anne’s Record-Observer. In retirement, Howard serves on the boards of several non-profits on the Eastern Shore, Annapolis and Philadelphia.

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Howard

Fault Lines by Jamie Kirkpatrick

November 3, 2020 by Jamie Kirkpatrick
Leave a Comment

Today—finally!—is Election Day. No matter which candidate or party you support, I think you would have to admit that the last four years have exposed the deep fault lines that run under and through our country. They are fault lines of ideology, of wealth, of race, of gender, of religion, of sexual orientation, even of something as seemingly benign as our changing climate. Like Hamlet, we’re constantly prompted to ponder our own existence: to mask or not to mask; to gather or not to gather; to appoint or not to appoint. These, and so many more, are the questions of our day.

To a geologist, a fault line is simply a fracture or a fissure between two blocks of rocks that allow those blocks to move relative to each other. They may be as small as a few millimeters, or as large as continents, extending over thousands of miles. Our two most famous faults—maybe ‘infamous’ is a better descriptor—are the Hayward Fault and the San Andreas Fault that run under large parts of California, the tectonic boundaries between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate. Separately and together, these two faults have already reached a stress level sufficient to trigger an earthquake of a magnitude greater than 7.0, or what erudite seismologists refer to as “the next Big One.”

Now I’m no geologist; I wouldn’t even dare to play one on tv. But I know this: to a political scientist or a cultural anthropologist, fault lines are the perfect metaphorical equivalent for cataclysmic social change. By tonight or tomorrow or whenever the last ballots have been counted, we’ll see exactly where the fault lines in our society are cracking. Will the next Big One come from suburban women or Floridians or Latino voters or African-Americans or senior citizens or some other subset of the population? We’ll know soon enough.

Fault lines are formed as a brittle response to stress. Geologically speaking, it’s the movement of tectonic plates far below the surface of the earth that produces enough stress to break the rocks on the ground upon which we stand. Culturally speaking, the stresses affecting us these days are just as profound as the movement of tectonic plates: a global pandemic, racial injustice, inequities of wealth, discrimination based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, even excessive carbon emissions. The litany of sins is sadly endless. Moreover, the dubious motives, methods, and morality of the current administration has emboldened the right and galvanized the left, widening all those fault lines that lie beneath the surface of our body politic. It would be nice to think that in time, our wounds can heal, but the truth is that fault lines don’t just go away. The best we can hope for is that they will remain inactive for thousands of years but that’s not the way of this world. Those underlying plates will continue to move and shift and eventually, the ground above them will shake and crack. What do we do then? That’s the question to ask Yorik, but alas, Hamlet’s jester is long-since dead.

Here’s the best response I can come up with: try. Try to forgive. Try to understand. Try to love your neighbor as yourself. At the very least, try to reduce just one of the stresses lying along one of our myriad fault lines, whichever one you can. That might not seem like much, but maybe—just maybe—your ounce of effort might be enough to stave off the next Big One.

I’ll be right back.

Jamie Kirkpatrick is a writer and photographer who lives in Chestertown. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Washington College Alumni Magazine, and American Cowboy Magazine.
Two collections of his essays (“Musing Right Along” and “I’ll Be Right Back”) are available on Amazon. Jamie’s website is www.musingjamie.com

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Jamie

A Trump Second Term by Al Sikes

November 2, 2020 by Al Sikes
Leave a Comment

This is Donald J. Trump’s last campaign in which his name will appear on the ballot. Those voters who have supported him but disagree with his techniques (and there are many) need to maintain a distance if he wins a second term—an unshakable distance.

An intense opposition has developed during Trump’s first term. Predictably it is made up of those who identify as Democrats. But there is a layer who opposes him not so much on policy, but leadership style. At some level, leadership style is policy, not just tactics. 

Over a lifetime of watching, often close up, politics and politicians, I have become increasingly allergic to categorization. To me, being a Never-Trumper would have required dissent from all that he has done. Most recently, I agreed with his choice of Amy Coney Barrett to join the Supreme Court.

But I adamantly disagree with his exclusionary, self-obsessed political tactics. He is corrupting democracy—his tactics are policy. Every norm is somehow illegitimate if he finds it an obstacle to his adoration. Here is a too-short summary:

  • Free speech is fake if it doesn’t conform to his views or actions.
  • Opponents, by the mere fact of criticism, are corrupt or mentally disabled.
  • Institutions, for example, health agencies like the Center for Disease Control (CDC) or Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or National Institutes of Health (NIH), are burdened by incompetent bureaucrats when their views don’t comport with his.
  • Election rules that are regarded as opening doors to unfriendly voters are likewise corrupt.

I could go on; the list of bad faith institutions and actions in Trump’s telling seems infinite.

America, indeed democracy, requires some level of trust. We don’t have hundreds of thousands of secret police because most Americans go along with government rules and await the next election or go to the courts in an effort to overturn them.

To give muscle to trust, we have checks and balances; they are called States, the press, elections, and courts. Every President finds himself checked by Governors with different points of view. Every President is two years from Congressional elections that often turn on how the voters perceive the quality of Presidential leadership. 

In China, or Russia, or Iran, incumbent rulers do everything necessary to quash dissent. You trust the government or keep quiet. You parrot the state-directed media or keep quiet. If an order comes down requiring you to stay in your house during a pandemic, you stay in your house or go to jail.  

America’s protected freedoms preclude the kind of authoritarianism we claim to abhor. But, freedom’s protectors must be credible, or trust breaks down. When the President either wittingly or unwittingly undermines the Center for Disease Control, public health is compromised. When the President excoriates election rules, he takes on the constitution, which gives State authority over election procedures. And with elections on our mind, he says to his followers, “if I don’t win, it will be because the election is stolen.” Election integrity is the lifeblood of a healthy democracy. 

If the President wins another term, his thoughtful supporters should draw lines and take action. They should help protect American freedoms from careless and self-serving demonization. Laughing it off with that is just “Trump being Trump” will not do. We all have a stake in our freedoms. Criticizing opponents is the lingua franca of politics, but when demonizing America’s basic structures becomes the default choice, countervailing actions are essential. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Al, Point of View

Op-Ed: Election Jitters by George Merrill

October 29, 2020 by George R. Merrill
Leave a Comment

Got election jitters? I have. 

One fear I have is that when the election is over we will have no skills left to us to share its results as one America.  It is now painfully evident, and has been for a while, that no matter which side of the political spectrum to which we belong, we can’t seem to speak to those on the opposite side in ways we can be heard and understood –– not to agree, but just to be heard and understood. This chasm renders any significant conversations almost impossible as if both parties were speaking in different tongues.

Of late, good will in political conversation and communication has begun to atrophy, leaving in the wake only party sound bites and tense recriminations as if vitriol and moral indignation were all that was needed to establish one’s credibility and to clarify differences. This also occurs in families, my own included. I fear I can’t talk about the election in any way with some members of my family for fear, not so much about what they’ll say, but what I will. The result for me, and I know it is for many, has been to duck the whole topic with the relatives we differ with. This gets tense.

There’s an old story that marriage counselors tell about fighting couples.

Betsy and Bob sleep together in the same bed. They have one electric blanket with two sets of controls. Bob gets cold easily so he turns the heat up.    Betsy, likes it cooler so is always turning her dial down. Unbeknownst to both is that the control dials are mixed up: she has his and he has hers. As each of them try to find their own comfort zone, they inadvertently create more discomfort for their spouse. They become angry. They don’t realize that ultimately, the mechanism available to regulate their own comfort must be in their own hands. I think we Americans are in a similar fix. 

If there’s good will and curiosity about what had been happening, that the couple in fact did have the means to regulate their own comfort and at the same time accommodate their differences, it might save the marriage. The problem in standoff’s like that is that people get so angry, they begin building up stories and rationales in their minds that justify their feelings. That makes attempts to meet in the middle feel like weakness or even personal defeat.

In situations of marital discord, establishing good will is critical in resolving conflict and preserving a marriage. It works pretty much the same way in a democracy. Good will is where accommodation begins, not in the courts. 

Pray for good will. 

Columnist George Merrill is an Episcopal Church priest and pastoral psychotherapist. A writer and photographer, he’s authored two books on spirituality: Reflections: Psychological and Spiritual Images of the Heart and The Bay of the Mother of God: A Yankee Discovers the Chesapeake Bay. He is a native New Yorker, previously directing counseling services in Hartford, Connecticut, and in Baltimore. George’s essays, some award winning, have appeared in regional magazines and are broadcast twice monthly on Delmarva Public Radio.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Random Thoughts Before the Election by J.E. Dean

October 28, 2020 by J.E. Dean
Leave a Comment

It’s been a long two years since the 2020 election got underway.  Now the light is at the end of the tunnel.  Absent truly unforeseen events, a new President will have been elected a week from now.  The outcome may not yet be certified, but it looks like the blue wave some of us have been hoping for and others dreading is about to crest.

Pollsters tell us that nearly everyone who will vote has either already voted or chosen a candidate, in some cases months ago.  I am in both categories.   I am so over Trump that if Biden shot someone on Fifth Avenue, I might still vote for him.  Call it Trump Denial Syndrome (TDS) if you like, but I don’t owe Trump another chance to be a President that I can respect.  I do owe it to my fellow citizens to help escort Trump and his family out of the White House.

But this column is not about why Trump is bad or why Biden is good.  It’s about the future. Truth be told, while a Trump loss is good, it may be a mistake to celebrate too soon. What a Biden-Harris administration will look like isn’t clear.  Many things, some good and some bad, might lie ahead.  

With that thought, here are a few things on my mind. 

Will Biden be a centrist President?  I hope he will.  If he attempts to implement the Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren agenda, he could start to lose support pretty quickly.  How many people do you know who supported Biden to move the country radically left?   In my case, it’s a minority.  Many, many Biden supporters are simply anti-Trump.  And some of those actually support Trump’s tax, trade, and regulatory policies. They just concluded he was crazy and unfit to be President.

I will be watching Biden’s early actions closely.  Who will he appoint to the cabinet and other top posts?   What will be in his coronavirus relief bill? 

Will Democrats try to pack the Supreme Court?  I hope not.  Doing so would create a terrible precedent and make the Court a political appendage of Congress rather than a co-equal third branch of government.  The expedited confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett doesn’t justify undermining the Constitution.   Two wrongs don’t make a right.   If the Democrats end up with the Presidency, the House and the Senate, that is enough.

Will Biden spend the country into a period of inflation or something worse?   The Biden transition team is already working on another trillion-dollar stimulus bill. The legislation is likely to be enacted within a month or so after Biden takes office.  That will be a good thing.  The country is in economic crisis.   But will that spending, combined with the likely spending on some of Biden’s domestic policy agenda—things like part of the Green New Deal, health care reform, and education (including student loan forgiveness)—create inflation?  I hope not, but I don’t know.  I’ve been reading The Deficit Myth  by Stephanie Kelton.  The book is about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). The author suggests that the government can engage in massive spending without inflation if that spending supports economic activity.  Interesting, while I support a strong response to today’s economic crisis, I hope Biden and the Democrats don’t go overboard. I also have a lot to learn about MMT.

How much worse will the pandemic get before it gets better?  Note that I didn’t ask whether the pandemic would get worse.  We already know that infections are rising across the country.  The new President will hopefully do a better job than Trump. (It would be difficult to do  worse.)  I expect Dr. Fauci to play a prominent leadership role going forward. That is a good thing.  I also expect Biden to continue to urge people to practice social distancing and mask-wearing.  There will be fewer infections, deaths, and additional economic disruption under Biden than there would have been under Trump. 

Will we see the nation’s first virtual inauguration?  I would say probably.  Biden will not want to start his Presidency with a Superspreader event.  Smart.  I plan on attending.

How will Biden hold up over four years?  Biden is 77 years old.  Recall those pictures of Presidents on their first inauguration day and on the day they leave office.  For most Presidents, the job is a difficult, stressful one.  Most Presidents don’t have time for hundreds of rounds of golf.  Trump’s record will be safe during the Biden years.  But the real issue here is how a President as old as Biden will do given the demands of the job.  Will he simply delegate away a lot of the day-to-day responsibilities?  If so, to whom?  And, as much as none of us want to think about it, what if his health declines?  Recall that Ronald Reagan evidenced early signs of dementia in his second term.  I’m worried about this issue.  I don’t think its unpatriotic to think about it. I hope that Biden and the team he is assembling are thinking about it.

Who is Kamala Harris?  We are learning a lot about Senator Harris fast. She is considered to be the most liberal Senator. That disturbs me a bit, but she has only been in the Senate four years.  Notably, Harris endorsed the Biden platform painlessly.  That suggests she may be more of a pragmatist than she is given credit for.  If she sees the whole country as her constituency as vice president, rather than California, that will be the case.

What is the future of the Republican party?  I am among those who believe that Trump has killed the Republican party.   Anytime the first thing you think of when you hear the word “Republican” is “racist” or “criminal,” the GOP is in trouble.   What type of party will emerge from the mess Trump created?  Will we see a return of the “country club Republicans” associated with Gerald Ford and Eisenhower?  Will the right-wing of the party take over entirely?  I don’t know.  If the right wing takes over, it’s time for moderates to start figuring out how to form a new party, one built around civility, free trade, civil rights, reasonable regulation, and other “traditional Republican values.”

Will Trump, his family and his allies be prosecuted?   Importantly, the decision on whether Donald Trump gets prosecuted for things like tax and insurance fraud is not entirely in the hands of Joe Biden.  More than one State Attorney General is likely to indict him.  Personally, I hope Trump is treated like anyone else.  If he committed the crimes he has been accused of, he deserves to be prosecuted.  I expect Biden feels the same way.  We already know that State prosecutors are waiting in the wings. Trump could be under indictment in New York before the end of Spring. 

We are on the cusp of a new era of government—the Biden-Harris era.  It will be more civil, somewhat boring, and, hopefully, largely tweet-free.  I’m ready for it.

J.E. Dean of Oxford is a retired attorney and public affairs consultant. For more than 30 years, he advised clients on federal education and social service policy.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, J.E. Dean

Admitting that Sometimes We’re Deplorable is the First Step to Recovery by Maria Grant

October 26, 2020 by Maria Grant
Leave a Comment

Political pundits claimed that Hillary Clinton lost the election because of her comments about “deplorables.” Specifically, Hillary said that half of Trump’s supporters belong in a “basket of deplorables” characterized by “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic” views. Trump capitalized on that theme during the final month before the 2016 election. He made it clear that Hillary didn’t care about a huge segment of America. Instead she found them “deplorable.”

I’ve been thinking a lot about that word. The fact is many “deplorable” things are going on in America right now. Perhaps some would call these occurrences by another name. But if we are honest, we would own up to this reality. Let’s just review some items on that list of deplorable actions. 

First, make no mistake about it. It is deplorable to separate children from their parents at the border and put them in cages. It just is. The fact that 545 children cannot be rejoined with their parents is an unconscionable dereliction of duty on the part of the United States. Some of these children were babies when they were separated and have been without their parents for more than two years.

Second, it is deplorable to speak about women in misogynistic terms. Comments made recently about Kamala Harris are beyond the pale. Disagreeing with her political views is one thing. Personal comments about her are quite something else. Recently, posts have questioned whether she’s really an American citizen and qualified to run for President. Some question whether a Jamaican and an Indian qualifies as being Black. Others claim that she slept her way to the top. Still others question her competence, including the President of the United States, who also has called Harris a monster. He seems to have a major problem with powerful women whom he does not control. 

Third, the hate groups on both sides—Antifa, the Proud Boys and others– are deplorable. Inciting violence and stoking hatred is never a good idea. In fact, it is a deplorable way to act. It is the opposite of what John Lewis would call “good trouble.” Rather it is bad trouble that should have no place in our society.  

Fourth, Trump jumped all over Biden’s comments about curtailing the oil industry during the last debate. He attempted to stoke the “Biden will tank the economy” fires, claiming that Biden would cause mass unemployment in states like Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas. To my way of thinking, it’s deplorable if we don’t make efforts as a nation to reduce pollution and create new ways to get the job done using renewable energy. It’s deplorable that we worry only about short-term optics and not the future of our environment. Why is the United States government continuing to subsidize fossil fuels at all? Already oil companies see the writing on the wall, and the smart ones are taking steps to migrate in that direction. To not do so, is short-sighted and demonstrates a clear lack of concern for future generations. 

Fifth, it’s deplorable to care about no one—not even yourself–during a pandemic and refuse to comply with recommended CDC guidelines. It’s been proven, without a doubt, that motorcycle rallies, political rallies, campus bar hopping, and massive beach parties are super-spreader events. Shortly after each of these activities major COVID spikes have occurred.  By being cavalier about your own behavior, you can spread the virus to others who may be much more vulnerable than you.     

Sixth, it’s deplorable that we have not progressed further in implementing reasonable gun control legislation that keeps guns out of the hands of criminals and those suffering with mental illnesses. It is possible to do so and still protect second amendment rights. Because of the lack of vision and leadership on this issue, thousands of innocent people have died.  

Finally, it’s “deplorable” for politicians to capitalize on the prejudices or lack of understanding of some voters by playing on these deficiencies to their own benefit. Examples of this strategy include such statements as; Mexicans are taking your jobs. They are rapists. Democrats want to turn America into a Socialist country.  It will be like Venezuela, etc.   

Maya Angelou once said, “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” 

We know that separating children from their parents is wrong. We know that making sexist, racist, and homophobic comments is wrong. We know that continuing to pollute our environment and not taking proper remediation efforts is wrong. We know that putting other people’s health in jeopardy is wrong. We know that allowing dangerous people to own firearms is wrong. And we know that feeding on people’s prejudices solely for our own benefit is wrong.

As a nation, we know better and we should do better. We can set an example. We can be a beacon of hope. We can push reset and try again.

Maria Grant served as Principal-in-Charge of the Federal Human Capital practice of Deloitte Consulting. Since her retirement, she has focused on writing, music, reading, travel, gardening and nature.  

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Snapshots of Daily Life: Cardinals

October 25, 2020 by George R. Merrill
Leave a Comment

The cardinal from hell is back. This time, he’s assaulting my studio windows.

Many years ago, I had a disturbing experience with a cardinal. He became obsessed with the rear-view mirrors of my car. Every day he would fly at them, pecking furiously at the mirror while leaving his droppings down the side of my car. What was he doing? Was he attacking what he saw in the mirror as if it were his adversary or had he fallen in love with his own Image and, like Narcissus, lavished it with pecks and kisses?  After a while he finally gave up and that ended the matter. In the meantime, he’d left a dreadful mess on my car. I was furious. 

In my studio recently, I heard a noise at the window. Would you believe it was a cardinal attacking or ravishing the window exactly as I’d seen happen years ago with my car mirrors? What does one do? He would not stop. The light struck the window such that the window was able to reflect his image, like a mirror. I thought the only thing I could do was to somehow put something over the window so that there would be no reflection.

Taking several sheets of paper on which I had old research material written, I taped the papers on the window, effectively blocking the reflection. That way I hoped he would lose interest in the window.  I inadvertently left a small section of the window uncovered and sure enough he went for it and began his combative assaults, or was he abandoning himself to his passions. I never knew which

I was determined to put an end to this outrageous behavior. I went outside again with more paper, and taped additional pages on all of the places at the window where I thought he would be able to see his image. After taping them up, I went back into the house. I stayed there, undisturbed for several hours. I knew that I’d successfully driven him off.  I had put an end to this unnatural behavior. I went outside just to check to see how secure the pages were. 

I noticed for the first time the nature of the research material I had written on the several sheets of paper. The material contained data I’d collected on the history of cathedrals.

I am a member of Trinity Cathedral here in Easton. There had been increasing interest in the diocese in reviewing the place and function of a cathedral in the religious and social life of the twenty first century. What new functions might cathedrals have in today’s changing society. I did some research on how cathedrals evolved and what role they played in English, French, Spanish and more recently in American societies.

Cathedrals have occupied a significant place in medieval social and religious life. As the Church of England spread its influence here on the shore, Trinity Cathedral here in Easton was the Shore’s first and only Cathedral. I am a communicant, there.

Cathedrals today are visual remnants of the power and wealth that Christianly once enjoyed. The majestic aura of cathedrals that once awed Christians and others as well, had mystical significance, to be sure, but were also monuments to power and prestige. They remain an awesome sight today and people the world over, religious or not, travel to see them, simply because they are magnificent structures. I myself was ordained a priest in the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City. Sadly, many cathedrals have become increasingly museum pieces, valued for their architectural magnificence, but not venerated for the divine vision that inspired them. 

I had since lost interest in my research and doubted whether I’d ever apply what I’d learned to anything useful. I tucked the papers away planning to use the blank sides for scrap paper.

Only much later did it occur to me that cardinals (clerics) are regular visitors to cathedrals. They go in and out of them all the time. Cardinals belong there.  They perform many of the ritual and liturgical rites of Christianity. What had not occurred to me until I recognized the subject of the papers I’d placed on the windows, was how, in a sense, I was using my investigation into one kind of cardinal’s habitation, to drive another kind away from my own. Like a homeopathic physician, I was administrating to myself a modified dose of the toxin attacking me, in order to mitigate its debilitating effects.

Of course, cardinals, the ones with wings, are not literate. The cardinal attacking my windows would have no way of knowing anything about the subject of the documents that were frustrating his access to my studio windows. While the irony of this may well have been lost on this cardinal, it was not lost on me. Where the papers ended up may have been an ignominious end to my noble research endeavors. They were covered with bird droppings. I took some comfort in the thought that at least my efforts were not totally in vain. They found a use.

I normally associate a cardinal (cleric) with heavenly preoccupations. This cardinal hammering at my studio windows, was surely from hell. It’s worth noting how traditional satanic images appearing in masks and paintings, will portray the devil as bright red . . . like a cardinal.

There are cardinals and there are cardinals.

Columnist George Merrill is an Episcopal Church priest and pastoral psychotherapist. A writer and photographer, he’s authored two books on spirituality: Reflections: Psychological and Spiritual Images of the Heart and The Bay of the Mother of God: A Yankee Discovers the Chesapeake Bay. He is a native New Yorker, previously directing counseling services in Hartford, Connecticut, and in Baltimore. George’s essays, some award winning, have appeared in regional magazines and are broadcast twice monthly on Delmarva Public Radio.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 1 Homepage Slider, George

The Only Relevant Question After the Debate by Craig Fuller

October 23, 2020 by Craig Fuller
Leave a Comment

The final debate of the Presidential campaign….and, the winner is? Kristen Welker, the moderator! She actually managed to moderate a discussion of sorts.

The key question to ask, after watching the debate or hearing the news reports, are you more inclined to vote for Donald Trump?

Going into the debate, I know of no poll suggesting the momentum had shifted. Polls tell us where voters are at the moment; and, at the moment a decisive majority of voters have trended to Joe Biden.

All the Trump campaign can do is wake up this morning and seek opportunities in key states.

However, to create an opportunity for Trump, voters in Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Iowa, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Florida and even Texas would have to had seen something about President Donald Trump to encourage them to support his reelection. Only time will tell whether this final debate made a difference in these key states.

There is a good deal of talk about how 48 million people have already voted. Truth is, that really is not all that relevant. Those voters had already made up their mind and it is highly unlikely that anything in last night’s debate would have moved them in a new direction. For most people, the discussion probably reinforced their views going into the evening.

What is important, is how many people go out and vote this weekend. If the numbers are high, it would suggest that people waited for the last debate and then decided. I would not be surprised to see early voting growing.

One other challenge for President Trump. While millions of people watched the debate and the follow on press coverage, millions will also watch President Trump’s performance this Sunday evening on 60 Minutes. And, thanks to the decision by President Trump to release his video of the interview, we know how that will go. And, there is no chance the 60 Minutes version of the interview will be better than the Trump video. What is clear is that most of the interview was a verbal battle over whether the President has a health care plan and on just how damaging Hunter Biden might be to his father’s campaign.

Health care is an important issue, but after watching the 60 Minute interview, Lesley Stahl will repeatedly remind people that the President has no health care plan. And, to the extent the President spends time trying to advance a Hunter Biden story, he is, in my opinion, dwelling on a topic few care to understand and even fewer will be moved by when it comes to their vote. Even on the President’s video, on neither topic did he look particularly strong.

So, the two major media events in the final days of the campaign stand little chance of moving the needle much when it comes to the electorate. In the end, the outcome surely hinges on something as old as elections themselves, voter turnout. If you care about how this election turns out, go out and vote!

Craig Fuller served four years in the White House as assistant to President Reagan for Cabinet Affairs, followed by four years as chief of staff to Vice President George H.W. Bush. Having been engaged in five presidential campaigns and run public affairs firms and associations in Washington, D.C., he now resides on the Eastern Shore.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Craig

Post-Debate by Al Sikes

October 23, 2020 by Al Sikes
Leave a Comment

This column was finished several days ago but held because of last night’s debate. Believing the debate offered no fresh insights, these are my pre- and post-debate views.

Writing about politics is discouraging and unnerving. Unnerving, because we live in a time of rhetorical trip-wires. Words and phrases that seem descriptive turn out to be somehow insulting.

Discouraging, because few writers go beyond Donald Trump’s latest outrage, which is, of course, simply a repetition of a long established pattern of conduct. Trump loves it.

Recall P. T. Barnum who was once interviewed by a woman who told him that she was writing a book, and that it would contain something disagreeable about him. “No matter, madam,” was his reply, “say anything you like about me, but spell my name right — P. T. B-a-r-n-u-m, P. T. Barnum — and I’ll be pleased anyway.” Quote Investigator

One benefit to living in Maryland is that the candidates don’t target the State with advertisements. The State is taken for granted—too bad. If it weren’t for yard signs—dueling shout-outs—you could almost forget we will soon be electing a President. Yet, how nice it is to escape much of the harsh manufactured rhetoric.

There was a time several decades ago when I was deeply involved in elective politics—fortunately a more benign version. During that time, I learned polling analysis under the watchful eye of Bob Teeter, who was then one of the preeminent Republican pollsters. 

One of Bob’s observations was that late campaign momentum usually ran to the candidate’s ceiling. The numerical ceiling was composed of those who were simply not open to the momentum candidate’s appeal. My sense is that President Trump now has the momentum as he campaigns, not for his vision, but against the amalgamation of leftist causes earlier associated with Senator Bernie Sanders. 

But for Mr. Trump there is an unwelcome question—what is the ceiling? My sense is that it is too low for him to win. Unpopular as this view might be, I predict Biden will win because Trump lost. 

While it will be claimed there is now an obligation for a Biden presidency to pursue a Leftist agenda, he will do so at considerable peril. Joe Biden’s finishing momentum in the Democratic primaries was a reflection of Senator Sander’s electoral ceiling. A majority of Democrats didn’t buy his agenda and Biden was the alternative.

If Biden wins, the result, in my view, will be loud and clear. There is a critical mass that, regardless of policy positions, wants decency back in the White House. One notable characteristic of most Trump supporters, past and present, is that while they support many of his policies, they are embarrassed by his conduct.

Joe Biden is campaigning on “decency” and the related theme of uniting Americans. I anticipate that these overriding themes and the President’s inability to control his self-love will prevail. 

But, back to the race as I know it today. In a sense, the “decency” part will be relatively easy—the bar is embarrassingly low. The uniting part is going to be difficult. If Biden is true to the theme, he will reject 20th century socio-economic theories, their costs and failures.

We live in the artificial intelligence (AI) century—databases and machine learning are game changers. Google and Amazon prove the change every single day in most of our lives. Intelligent systems both know us and can shape and distribute messages that influence our lives. 

This capability comes with dangers and opportunities. But, on the opportunity side, intelligent systems must be conceived, built, shaped and led by people whose knowledge of these systems began at elementary school age. Trump and Biden were elementary school age in the 1940s and 50s. 

The pandemic has been instructive on several levels. One word is used over and over to define remedial policies—efficacy. Efficacy means: “capacity for producing a desired result or effect; effectiveness.” While some words are being canceled, “efficacy” should be promoted. Broadly speaking, as we tackle persistent problems that we have the capacity to prevent, 21st Century tools intelligently deployed can overcome problematic inertia. Structural change is needed, not more 20th Century program overlays.

Maybe, starting in elementary school, the word efficacy should be taught, as commonly used and understood words and phrases help shape society. Left, Right and Center should begin to demand efficacy; after all it is our money that is being spent and our children and grandchildren are going to have to pick up the debt tab.  Unrealizable political promises deplete; we certainly don’t need more depletion.

Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al recently published Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Al

Life’s Lessons—The Last Chapter

October 22, 2020 by Angela Rieck
Leave a Comment

The retirement chapter of life has been my most challenging.  Perhaps because I was thrust into it without a plan.  Like many readers, I have lived a (heretofore unrecognized) privileged life.  Despite some disappointments and tragedies, I could rely on the support of a loving and supportive husband, daughter, friends, and family. I found meaning in a successful career.

I raced through life, balancing everything.  I expected my life to go well.  And, for the most part, it did.

Until it didn’t.  I was unprepared for what followed.

There are many courses and books available to help; but, as I usually do, I look to people to inspire me.

So, what I have learned?  First, I have stopped racing through life and recognize that it is a gift, health is a gift, friends are a gift, family is a gift.  Gratitude and happiness are choices.  I guess I can summarize my learning into three themes:

  1. Never stop dreaming.

It is not true that people stop pursuing dreams because they grow old, they grow old because they stop pursuing dreams.” Gabriel Garcia Marquez

“Hold fast to dreams, for if dreams die, life is a broken-winged bird that cannot fly.”  Langston Hughes

  1. Appreciate the wisdom gained through life experiences.

“The afternoon knows what the morning never suspected.” Robert Frost

“Wisdom is the reward for surviving our own stupidity.” Brian Rathbone

  1. Appreciate the time gift of time.

“The longer I live, the more beautiful life becomes.” Frank Lloyd Wright

“As you grow, you learn more. If you stayed at twenty-two, you’d always be as ignorant as you were at twenty-two. Aging is growth. It’s more than the negative that you’re going to die, it’s also that you understand you’re going to die, and you live a better life because of it.”― Mitch Albom, Tuesdays with Morrie

So how does this show up?

My friend, Dodie, 80, decided to go skydiving.

That’s right, skydiving.

I had to learn more.

Q:  Why skydiving?

Dodie: This is been on my bucket list for a long time.  At first, I wanted to confront fear.  I ended up experiencing fear earlier on a climb and repel journey.  But I still wanted to do it and watched a couple of YouTube videos and I saw a 96-year old woman doing it.  So I knew that I could do it.

Q:  This is a tough time to be doing this with COVID 19; fear of broken bones, etc.

Dodie: It was a tandem jump (where you are belted in with an experienced sky diver), so I felt safe.  Everything was COVID 19 protected.  I stayed in the moment and I wasn’t nervous or fearful.

Q:  How did it feel?

Dodie: When they opened the door and I put my feet out, I was awestruck.  There is nothing that I could compare this to.  Not like hang gliding or fast skiing.  It was exhilarating.  I fell 5,000 feet in 60 seconds.  But I did not feel like I was falling.

Q:  Is this a different experience for you at this age rather than when you were younger?

Dodie: Yes, definitely.  In my younger years, I would have raced through it.  But time has taught me patience and to live in the moment.  I don’t think about yesterday or tomorrow…just today.

In my younger years I might have worried about it.  But I had seen the videos and I wasn’t afraid.  Since I live in the moment, I didn’t anguish over it at all.

Also, I had nothing riding on this.  I chose to do it for the experience only, and I had no expectations.

And I enjoyed every second.

Q:  What advice would you like to share?

Dodie:  Bring a cheering section, it makes it even more fun.  Everyone was cheering as I landed, and it became a celebration.

But mostly, remember that you are never too old and it is never too late.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Angela

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Cambridge
  • Commerce
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Food & Garden
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • News
  • Point of View
  • Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Contact Us
  • COVID-19: Resources and Data

© 2025 Spy Community Media. | Log in