MENU

Sections

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
June 22, 2025

Cambridge Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Cambridge

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
3 Top Story Point of View Angela

Keeping Up Proteins by Angela Rieck

June 12, 2025 by Angela Rieck
Leave a Comment

Most of us are not getting enough protein in our diets. 

In adults weighing 150 pounds, scientists recommend a minimum of 54 – 80 grams of protein per day (with some recommending 136 grams of protein per day). That is a lot of protein. Specific protein needs vary based on age, activity level, and individual goals (e.g., weightlifters, fitness activists).

And, as we age, our protein needs increase in order for us to maintain muscle mass and overall health. For older people, a minimum of 68 or more grams are recommended for someone of 150 pounds. While the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for older adults is still the same as for younger adults, emerging research suggests that older adults need more protein.

Aging causes our body to become less efficient at using protein for muscle growth and repair, a phenomenon called anabolic resistance. Sufficient protein intake is crucial for slowing or preventing muscle loss. Adequate protein intake helps maintain our muscle mass, which is vital for mobility, independence, and overall quality of life. 

So, we need to start counting our protein and most likely we will find that we are not getting enough. Dieticians recommend eating lean meats, dairy, poultry, fish, eggs, beans, lentils, and nuts throughout the day. Some recommend using protein supplements. It is also important to spread protein intake across multiple meals to optimize muscle protein synthesis. (But don’t go over recommended amounts of protein as it will cause extra work for the kidneys.)

Exercise plays a part as well. People who exercise regularly, especially those who use some sort of weight training, require more protein for muscle repair and growth. Also, those of us trying to lose weight need a higher protein intake, as protein helps with feeling full and can aid in burning more calories. 

Any movement is important in keeping up muscle mass. A 2022 study found taking regular, short walking breaks after eating improved the body’s ability to turn dietary proteins into the muscle. 

So we don’t just need to consume more protein as we age, it is also important that we move as well. Building muscle by movement, exercise and weight training is important for translating what we eat into muscle mass and flushing damaged proteins from our muscles. To effectively use and store protein, we have to do some form of movement.

Personally, I started watching my protein intake the beginning of the year and I realized that I was not getting nearly enough protein. Since increasing my protein, I have noticed that I have much more energy and feel healthier. 

But getting enough protein is still hard, but it is worth it.


Angela Rieck, a Caroline County native, received her PhD in Mathematical Psychology from the University of Maryland and worked as a scientist at Bell Labs, and other high-tech companies in New Jersey before retiring as a corporate executive. Angela and her dogs divide their time between St Michaels and Key West Florida. Her daughter lives and works in New York City.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Angela

What the President is Doing for Us by J. E. Dean

June 11, 2025 by J.E. Dean
1 Comment

Sometimes, the comments made on editorials are more interesting than the editorials themselves. Take mine, for example. With admirable regularity, I find something negative to say about the President. One week, I complained about his cabinet appointments. The next, I complained about the tariffs. I also have written against Trump’s denying deportees’ due process. I wrote that seizing suspected illegal immigrants off the street, loading them onto planes, and delivering them to South Sudan is wrong.

Several readers have asked me why I can’t simply acknowledge all the good that Trump is doing for America. The idea, I think, is that Trump may be quirky, but he is doing a lot to make America better.  We need to overlook things about Trump such as his name-calling or redecorating the White House in gold and focus on the good stuff. 

One reader even reminded me, as the White House Press Secretary does frequently, that Trump is a highly successful businessman who has given up “everything” to Make America Great Again.” This obviously isn’t true. 

I wish I could write something positive about Donald Trump, but I can’t. I’m not able to point to a single positive thing that he deserves credit for. 

What about border security, you ask?  I support rational regulation of immigration, including securing the borders. Trump lost me with the prison in El Salvador and the flights to South Sudan.  

What about the decrease in the rate of inflation?  Less inflation is a good thing, but did Trump make it happen? I don’t think so. The CPI was headed down before Trump took office.  Did the possibility of Trump winning the election do the trick? Of course not.

 Inflation peaked at more than 9 percent in 2022 when Biden was President. Economists tell us that disruptions in the supply chain resulting from the pandemic and increases in the cost of energy resulting from Russia’s war against Ukraine contributed to the increase.  Biden did not cause the pandemic.  It started in March 2020.  Trump was president and ignored covid until it was a national crisis. (You can be sure that if Biden had been president when the pandemic began, Trump would have blamed it on Biden.)

And who believes Trump when he claims that Russia would never have invaded Ukraine had he been President? Remember that Trump also claimed he would end the war “on Day One” of his second term or even before taking office? I do.  Blaming Biden for the war is, to put it mildly, a stretch. 

 And what about Biden’s spending? By 2024, the annual rate of inflation was down to 3.3 percent, despite the enactment of Biden’s multi-trillion-dollar bills to address climate change and other domestic policy needs. And, as a resident of the Eastern Shore, I enthusiastically supported federal spending and regulation to address climate change.

Had Biden been reelected, inflation may have continued to decrease, but we’ll never know. What we do know is that four months into his presidency, Trump is taking credit for fixing the economy.  This may prove premature. By the end of the year, Trump’s tariffs may drive prices higher.  Most economists say that is probable. (But don’t expect Trump to admit he was wrong or take responsibility for the problem.)

And what will happen if his ludicrously named “Big Beautiful Bill” is enacted? We know that his pending multibillion dollar extension of his 2017 tax cuts and increases in defense and border security spending will increase the national debt by more than $2.8 trillion over the next 10 years.

Some will disagree that Trump takes credit for positive developments that he had little to do with. But what about the things he says “make America great again” that do nothing of the sort? Let me list a few:

Eliminating funding for public television and radio. (Cut because Trump views them as critical of his policies.)

Cutting medical research. Are we supposed to be grateful for Trump ending important cancer clinical trials? 

Ending efforts to combat climate change, including attempting to rescind money for projects already appropriated by Congress. If you live within 50 miles of an ocean shoreline, you should be worried. 

Redecorating the Oval Office in gold. Please don’t tell me I’m supposed to take pride in this decorating fiasco. And who is going to pay to have it all taken down after Trump leaves office?

Attacking Harvard University and its students. Why this obsession with Harvard? Destroying Harvard will not make America great—it will destroy something that is part of American greatness.

Attacking Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs. How exactly does ending DEI programs benefit white males or help American citizens who are people of color?

Appointing himself to Chair the Kennedy Center. I liked the pre-Trump programming at the Kennedy Center. Trump wants to replace classical music, opera and other “highbrow” culture with more popular fare corresponding to his own taste. Surprise! Ticket sales have dropped dramatically.

End the Department of Education and funding for low-income students, teacher development, student aid, and educational research.

Holding a $45 million dollar parade on your birthday because June 14 is also the anniversary of the U.S. Army. I predict massive disruption, massive damage to DC roads, massive protests, and potentially serious misdeeds. 

Cutting benefits and services to Veterans. 

Closing Social Security Offices. I don’t like waiting on the phone for an hour to get a question answered from someone who has no clue how to solve the problem.

Watching Kristi Noem flash a Rolex in front of the infamous El Salvadoran prison. Her stunt was embarrassing and shameful. A good president would have fired her.

I could go on with this list. Let’s be clear. President Trump claims things “Make America Great Again,” that don’t. Many of his actions take benefits and services from Americans, undermine the rule of law, and jeopardize democracy.  

Dare I say it, Trump is making his bed—a legacy of chaos and a reversal of progress—and will have to sleep in it. Fifty years from now, it will be  clear that Trump was a much worse president than Nixon. The gold trim in the Oval Office, the Qatari 747, the Crypto, Musk dancing with a chainsaw, and Trump’s devotion to the game of golf will be what is remembered. What also will be remembered is the number of decades it will take to put the country back in order. 

 If we are lucky and work together to stop the madness, Trump will be seen as an aberration and an embarrassment, nothing more.

J.E. Dean writes on politics, government but, too frequently, on President Trump. A former counsel on Capitol Hill and public affairs consultant, Dean also writes for Dean’s Issues & Insights on Substack.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, J.E. Dean

Chesapeake Music’s Chamber Festival—a Veritable Embarrassment of Riches by Maria Grant

June 10, 2025 by Maria Grant
Leave a Comment

Sheer perfection would be an apt description of the first three concerts in Chesapeake Music’s six-concert Chamber Music Festival series at The Ebenezer Theater in Easton. I attended all three concerts and left exhilarated, inspired, and anxious to hear the remaining three concerts this Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. These upcoming concerts also feature The Juilliard String Quartet, dubbed the most important American quartet in history!

Photo by Cal Jackson

Themed “Reflection and Celebration” in honor of its 40th year, this Festival’s first three concerts featured a thoughtful pairing of amazingly talented seasoned musicians coupled with inspirational rising-star musicians who exhibit impressive talent beyond their years. Such juxtapositioning epitomizes how far the festival has come over the last four decades and its exciting potential in years to come. 

Chamber music was first performed in intimate private settings such as palace chambers, drawing rooms, and residential parlors. Thanks to Paul and Joanne Prager, Chesapeake Music’s home at The Ebenezer Theater provides a similar intimate setting to listen to amazing music but also offers more accessibility to exceptional musical performances with better acoustics and comfortable seating.

Co-artistic directors of Chesapeake Music Marcy Rosen (who also co-founded Chesapeake Music) and Catherine Cho developed programs that showcase beloved favorites, including Boccherini, Schumann, Brahms, Beethoven, Dvořák, Haydn, Mozart, and Mendelssohn, as well as less well-known and more modern composers, such as Amy Beach and Cécile Chaminade. 

In addition to developing the programs, cellist Marcy Rosen and violinist Catherine Cho played several of the selected pieces accompanied by clarinetist and co-founder of Chesapeake Music J. Lawrie Bloom, pianist Robert McDonald, oboist Peggy Pearson, violist Zhanbo Zheng, and violinists/violists Todd Phillips and Carmit Zori. 

Two rising stars who also performed in several of those selections were cellist Sterling Elliott and pianist Albert Cano Smit. In addition, Elliott and Cano Smit played an Opus by Beach, and Cano Smit played two selections by Chaminade. These pieces were played to perfection and were a delightful opportunity to hear music with which audiences will surely want to become more familiar. 

This week’s Thursday, Friday, and Saturday concerts feature music by Mendelssohn, Farrenc, Smetana, Mozart, Widmann, Beethoven, Bonis, Schoenberg, and Fauré. For details about this week’s concerts and to purchase tickets, be sure to visit ChesapeakeMusic.org. 

Let’s never take for granted how fortunate we are to experience this caliber of music on the Eastern Shore. It is indeed a reflection of Chesapeake Music’s dedication and hard work, and a time to celebrate upcoming opportunities to hear phenomenal artistic talent perform glorious, inspirational music.

Maria Grant was principal-in-charge of the federal human capital practice of an international consulting firm and currently serves on the Board of Chesapeake Music. While on the Eastern Shore, she focuses on writing, reading, music, and nature.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Maria

Keeping score By Jamie Kirkpatrick

June 10, 2025 by Jamie Kirkpatrick
Leave a Comment

The fourth hole at Chester River Golf Club is a par three over water. Depending on the pin placement, from the regular tees, a successful shot—one that lands safely on the green—requires a carry of somewhere between 130 and 155 yards, and on many days, the wind makes the hole play a bit longer. It’s a lovely hole, but don’t be fooled: it can bite.

A few years ago, I was playing with my friend Key. I stepped onto the fourth tee, addressed the ball, and sent it—plunk!—to a watery grave. At that point, I had two options: I could hit my next shot from the drop area which was considerably closer to the green, or drop another ball on the tee on the line of my previous shot. Both options carried a one-stroke penalty. I’ll admit that I was frustrated so maybe that’s why I selected the second (and riskier) option. I dropped another ball on the tee, swung, and the ball flew up and away. It landed on the green, took a hop or two, and rolled straight into the hole. Later that afternoon, when I told my guru Eggman about what had happened, he yawned and said, “just another ho-hum par.”

Of course, he was right; my score on the hole was just a three that day. But there are threes and then there are threes, and this three was the latter. Keeping score matters.

I find myself keeping score a lot lately. Not as often on the Chester River golf course, but rather on the golf course of my life. I look back and see the error of my ways, and I remember the few times I hit it in the hole. I have no doubt I am many strokes over par on that particular golf course, but the memory of unexpected, even miraculous, recoveries help to soften the blow.

If keeping score matters, so does forgiveness. Here’s an example of what I mean by that: I am twelve years old, in seventh grade. Remarkably, I am in a front-row seat in Forbes Field watching my beloved Pittsburgh Pirates play the vaunted New York Yankees in the first game of the 1960 World Series. Mickey Mantle is at bat. I whisper a little prayer, something along the lines of “God, if You let me get a foul ball, I promise I will become a minister.” On the very next pitch—I swear this is true!—Mantle takes a mighty cut, nicks a piece of the ball, and that ball rolls right toward me. I lean over the railing and pick it up: a foul ball—a World Series foul ball off the bat of Mickey Mantle! I am beyond dizzy with excitement, until it hits me: I just made a promise to God. Now what do I do?

In the past couple of weeks, I’ve told this story to two people: my wife and a kind friend. (He and I happened to be on the Chester River golf course at the time.) I’d been thinking a lot about that day so many years ago, and I’m haunted by the memory because I did not fulfill the promise I made to God. But both my wife and my friend said essentially the same thing to me: look at the scorecard of your life. There are many ways to be a minister, and God is probably not too disappointed in you. Late in the game, that thought comforts me.

There are threes and then there are threes. There are ministers and then there are ways to minister.

I’ll be right back.

Jamie Kirkpatrick is a writer and photographer who lives on both sides of the Chesapeake Bay. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Washington College Alumni Magazine, and American Cowboy Magazine. His most recent novel, “The Tales of Bismuth; Dispatches from Palestine, 1945-1948” explores the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is available on Amazon and in local bookstores.

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Jamie

Expect the Unexpected in Presidential Elections By David Reel  

June 9, 2025 by David Reel
Leave a Comment

Few places in America outside of the political arena are more likely to affirm the timeless observation — always expect the unexpected.

This was certainly the case with regard to the 2024 Presidential election.

Relatively few people expected Joe Biden would perform so poorly in a debate with Donald Trump, and that his performance marked the beginning of the end of Biden’s re-election campaign.

Conversely, relatively few people expected Kamala Harris’s performance in her debate with Donald Trump would go well enough to temporarily jump start her ultimately unsuccessful campaign.

Relatively few people expected Donald Trump would win the election for a delayed second term with a significant majority of the popular vote and a solid majority in the Electoral College.

Less noticed, but important to consider, was the unexpected pivots by at least two left of center national newspapers — The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The New York Times — on their candidate endorsement decisions.

These pivots were especially noteworthy as all three of them endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, Hillary Clinton in 2016, and Joe Biden in 2020. Expectations were all three would endorse Kamala Harris in 2024. It did not happen.

Only The New York Times endorsed Harris.

The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times did not endorse Harris or Trump.

In the case with The Washington Post, publisher Will Lewis announced a new no presidential endorsements policy at the Post, not only for the 2024 presidential general election, but for future presidential general elections.

In announcing new policy Lewis said, “We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way. We see as a statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds on this, the most consequential of American decisions — whom to vote for as the next president. I am very excited about this new clarity and transparency and cannot wait to see it brought to life in our opinion section. Every Day.”

He also wrote in a memo to the staff at the Post — “This is not about siding with any political party. This is about being crystal clear about what we stand for as a newspaper. Doing this is a critical part of serving as a premier news publication across America and for all Americans.”

Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post and founder of Amazon, who purchased the newspaper after it was owned by the Meyer-Graham family for over eighty years, also recently wrote a memo to Post employees.

He wrote, “We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too, of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”

Bezos also wrote, “There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.”

In the case of The Los Angeles Times, Dr. Patrick Soon Shiong, a surgeon and entrepreneur who has been is the owner and Executive Chair of the paper since 2018, asked the editorial board to do a factual analysis of the policies of Harris and those of Trump during his first term.

He also asked them to provide their understanding of the policies and plans of Trump and Harris that they presented during this campaign and its potential effect on the nation in the next four years.

He wrote, “In this way, with this clear and non-partisan information side-by-side, our readers could decide who would be worthy of being president for the next four years.”

He noted the board “chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision.”

Going forward, it will be most interesting to see what The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The New York Times decide on their policies regarding presidential general election endorsements in the 2028 election cycle.

I predict The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times will maintain their most recent policy decisions and will not make general election endorsements in that election cycle.

I also predict The New York Times will maintain their most recent policy decision and will make general election endorsements in that election cycle.

For now, all I can write with certainty is they all have the power and a demonstrated willingness to retain or change their endorsement policies at any time for any reason.

That said, always expect the unexpected in the political arena.

David Reel is a public affairs and public relations consultant who lives in Easton.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, David

Twenty Characters, Three Lines By Laura J. Oliver

June 8, 2025 by Laura J. Oliver
Leave a Comment

I seldom donate money to anything but dire causes—children in need of food, animals in need of kindness, elections that need winning, my wardrobe —that kind of thing —but I got sucked in last week because my college played the urgency card.

“It’s your last chance, expiring at midnight tonight, to contribute to the college by buying a commemorative brick.” The brick was to be included in the renovation of the historic sidewalk in front of a dorm I had often visited on the grounds of the first college chartered in the sovereign United States of America (1782), — the only college to which George Washington gave permission to use his name and also contributed 50 guineas.

Each donor was to fill out a form indicating what they would like engraved on their brick. If GW could fork over 50 guineas, surely I could part with 150 George Washingtons, (although each of his guineas contained 22 karats of gold and mine were on VISA). But who wouldn’t want a piece of that action? And for a good cause? The conundrum being, what to have engraved? Three lines, a 20-character limit per line, including punctuation and spaces, to lie beneath the footsteps of students walking into their futures as I once had.

This shouldn’t have been hard, but it was ridiculous. My name seemed like a no-brainer, but my last name changed five days after graduation. Use both? Middle initial? Of maiden name or middle name? A wish for future generations? A quote from someone wise? A joke only one person would get?

What would you say? Three lines, 20 characters.

You leave home all possibility and unformed desire—searching for a stand-alone identity. I had arrived on campus at 18 with a crippling romanticism I still haven’t offloaded and the notion I might one day be a writer.

As I sat in my living room counting spaces and characters I remembered being told at a dinner party of a mysterious brick with a message on it embedded in an Annapolis sidewalk. I had walked these streets for years, looking down frequently to avoid breaking my neck on sidewalks uprooted by massive trees or those which age alone had hefted toward heaven. But I had never spotted a brick with letters on the surface. Who would have put it there and for what purpose, I wondered. I began looking down with a mission other than staying upright. I was on a treasure hunt across time–the treasure being a satisfied curiosity. Or perhaps to be the recipient of anonymous goodwill. Which is what I try to be every day.

After weeks of searching, one afternoon when I wasn’t looking at all, (lesson here but I won’t point to it), I looked down and there it was. A brick embedded in the sidewalk at a slight angle with two words engraved on it. No spoiler alerts– I’ll let you find it. Pro tip. It’s within sight of a very old church.

When the Main Street power lines in my town were buried in 1995 all the old bricks had to be taken up and were given away. I took one to use as a doorstop just because, well George Washington may have walked on it. Or Thomas Jefferson. Then I discovered that collecting bricks as pieces of history is a thing — there is a Facebook group called “Crazy about Bricks.”

I won’t be joining, but I do wonder if objects can hold onto energy. The way psychics ask to hold something once owned by the person being inquired about. How about all those clay handprints the kids made we have squirreled away. Were their hands ever that small? Is their energy still there? You know it is, or you would have tossed them out by now. How about that pocketknife you inherited? The ring? Can my brick hold all the hope for the future I brought to school from my past if it’s made in the present?

Have you figured out yet what you would carve into yours? Your name? Your dream? How it turned out?

Because now it is life that is playing the urgency card. From the far end of that pathway, how would you succinctly identify yourself, your calling, what you made of the gifts you were given, your precious time on the planet, circling the sun, a third of the way out on the arm of a spiral galaxy. What of yourself are you leaving behind?

The clock was ticking, and I had to pick something—anything– from the far end of the journey that had begun on that sidewalk. For all the dreams in my life that haven’t worked out, I decided to acknowledge the one that has.

Laura J. Pritchett
(Laura J. Oliver)

Writer. As planned.

Laura J. Oliver is an award-winning developmental book editor and writing coach, who has taught writing at the University of Maryland and St. John’s College. She is the author of The Story Within (Penguin Random House). Co-creator of The Writing Intensive at St. John’s College, she is the recipient of a Maryland State Arts Council Individual Artist Award in Fiction, an Anne Arundel County Arts Council Literary Arts Award winner, a two-time Glimmer Train Short Fiction finalist, and her work has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize. Her website can be found here.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 1 Homepage Slider, Laura

AHEAD: The Largest Spending Program You Have Never Heard of by Clayton Mitchell

June 6, 2025 by Clayton Mitchell
Leave a Comment

“There’s something happening here,
what it is ain’t exactly clear…”
— Buffalo Springfield, (“For What It’s Worth”)

I am willing to bet that most Marylanders reading this article have never heard of the “AHEAD Initiative.”

You are not alone. There was no bill introduced. No legislative hearing was held. There was no floor debate. No up or down vote in the Maryland General Assembly. 

Despite its sweeping scope and massive potential cost, the AHEAD Initiative, short for Advancing All Payer Health Equity Approaches and Development, entered Maryland’s policy bloodstream with barely a whisper. And yet, it may prove to be the most consequential and financially burdensome healthcare program Maryland has undertaken since the creation of Medicaid.

So… what is AHEAD?

AHEAD is a new federal health reform model designed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It aims to control healthcare costs, improve equity, and restructure how states deliver and pay for care by blending clinical services with social programs, such as housing assistance, food access, transportation support, and behavioral health integration.

In other words, it transforms the traditional health care model into a sweeping platform for population-level social engineering.

In early 2024, Maryland became the first state in the country to be approved for participation in the AHEAD program. The Moore administration signed onto this large spending commitment without legislative approval. Incredibly, none was required. The agreement was struck between Governor Wes Moore, then-Health Secretary Dr. Laura Herrera Scott, and the Biden Administration. Its goal is to redesign substantial portions of Maryland’s health care infrastructure and deliver specific cost savings and “equity outcomes” over the next decade.

Maryland is now the pilot project. The national laboratory. The guinea pig.

It is important to understand that AHEAD is layered on top of Maryland’s existing and already unique “all-payer” hospital system. Under the all-payer model, Maryland is the only state in the country where all insurers (including private plans, Medicare, and Medicaid) are required to pay the same fixed rates for hospital services, which are set by a state regulatory commission. This unified payment structure reduces administrative complexity, limits cost growth, and stabilizes hospital revenues. 

In return, Maryland receives billions of federal dollars and holds a rare federal waiver to set Medicare rates independently. It has worked successfully for decades.

Notwithstanding, AHEAD goes far beyond hospital billing and payment reform. It obliges Maryland to integrate a much broader range of social services into its health care delivery model, with services not previously covered by the longstanding all-payer system. 

These additional social services include publicly funded non-clinical programs such as permanent supportive housing for chronically ill individuals, food delivery for at-risk populations, ride services for medical and non-medical appointments, expanded behavioral and addiction services, and community-based care coordination efforts. 

The state is now responsible for building the infrastructure to manage and fund these services on a large scale.

But here is the part that should give every taxpayer pause: this new framework was not enacted through the democratic process. AHEAD was not introduced in a bill. It was not voted on by your elected representatives. It did not pass through a committee, nor did it undergo rigorous legislative fiscal impact analysis reviewed by the Legislature’s budget analysts or the public.

Instead, it was adopted through an executive agreement. And with it, Maryland has committed to a nine-year comprehensive transformation of its healthcare delivery system, with an unknown and potentially unsustainable price tag.

AHEAD requires Maryland to build out new regional bureaucracies, expand primary care subsidies, and integrate state-funded social services into Medicaid and other payer systems.

Looks like window dressing for a Moore presidential campaign at your expense, doesn’t it?

While federal startup money is modest (just twelve million dollars over several years), the actual long-term obligations for the state are wide open. While no official fiscal note has been released, and no regulations have been proposed, it is reasonable to expect that Maryland’s obligations under AHEAD could reach hundreds of millions, and potentially over one billion dollars annually, as the state expands its responsibility for housing, transportation, and other non-medical services tied to federally mandated “health equity” goals.

This is all happening while Maryland already faces a projected multibillion-dollar structural deficit, compounded by unfunded education mandates under the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future. AHEAD may be the second fiscal time bomb waiting to explode in taxpayers’ wallets, this time buried in the health care budget instead of the schools.

The state will be required to meet stringent federal performance benchmarks. If Maryland falls short, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can revoke its waiver authority to set Medicare rates, a unique power Maryland has held for decades. That could destabilize hospital revenues across the state.  Hospitals could potentially close.

Things could be worse… the Trump Administration could discover the one-of-a-kind deal Maryland has with its all-payer system and question why Maryland (a deep blue state) gets billions of federal dollars to pay for the uninsured, underinsured, and hospital write-offs, and eliminate our decades-old successful system. The AHEAD program and all the traditional costs all other states bear will then fall back onto Maryland taxpayers… and insurance premium payers. 

If the Trump administration decides to retreat from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ AHEAD model, Maryland could be left with massive programmatic costs and no federal backstop to help fund them. All of this is happening under the radar, without public scrutiny or proper transparency. 

Sometimes the guinea pig gets slaughtered.

Does anyone remember the Governor or the Secretary of Health discussing this on the news or in any open forum where questions may be asked of them? 

I do not recall any town hall, public briefing, or televised announcement explaining the goals, the risks, or the cost. A program that obligates the state to spend this much tax money over a decade should have been widely advertised with the enthusiasm of an elementary school ribbon cutting… especially if it is such an “impressive” revolutionary program.

I once remember a Governor who said he believed in transparency. I remember promises of open government, listening tours, accountability to the people, and governing in the sunlight rather than behind closed doors. 

Transparency, however, is not what you say after the fact. It is what you practice before the commitment is made. Transparency requires that you trust citizens enough to tell them what you are doing before you obligate their tax dollars, especially on a massive scale.

So here are a few questions worth asking; questions that Governor Moore and his team should answer.

  • How much will the AHEAD Initiative cost Maryland taxpayers annually by the year 2033?
  • What services or programs will be reduced or eliminated to pay for it?
  • What guardrails are in place to prevent uncontrolled spending growth?
  • Why was the General Assembly bypassed entirely for something of this magnitude?
  • What specific services is the state now obligated to provide under AHEAD that were not previously offered?
  • How will AHEAD’s success or failure be publicly measured, and who will be held accountable if it falls short?
  • What bureaucratic infrastructure is proposed, and what regulations are being promulgated for this initiative?

Marylanders deserve an honest discussion about the costs and tradeoffs of this initiative, not just slogans about “equity and innovation.” Because eventually, someone will have to pay for it. And that someone will be the Maryland taxpayer.

If the Governor believes this is a sustainable, transparent, efficient, and affordable approach to health care reform, he should make the case openly, publicly, and with quantifiable numbers.

Until then, the AHEAD Initiative will remain what it already is: the largest state spending program you have never heard of.

Clayton A. Mitchell, Sr. is a life-long Eastern Shoreman, an attorney, and former Chairman of the Maryland Department of Labor’s Board of Appeals.  He is co-host of the Gonzales/Mitchell Show podcast that discusses politics, business, and cultural issues.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Clayton

GOAT vs. TOAD by Al Sikes

June 6, 2025 by Al Sikes
Leave a Comment

The moment was vivid. I have written about it before, so apologies if this is your second time through.

The year, 1986. The President: Ronald Reagan. On the other side of the table, Secretary of Commerce, Malcom  Baldrige. Me, well I was talking to the Secretary about coming to work for him heading the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (they didn’t get advice from a naming consultant).

The first question from Secretary Baldrige: “Al, Washington is a god-damn tough town. Everybody is after a piece of your ass. How do you rate yourself for aggressiveness?” Over time I learned what he meant, but this is about a condition in our capitol city, not me.

There is a finality to government. Sure you can appeal a decision but if your appeal is through the courts check your bank and patience accounts and if it is a legislative solution you are seeking, good luck with that. Laws with national reach are a big deal.

One of the laughable characteristics of the white hot feud between President Donald J Trump and Elon Musk is that for months they have been playing each others cheerleader. And the praise can be summarized with this word: GREATEST! So here we are, in a brief period of time they went from greatest to worst. From “Greatest of All Time” (GOAT) to “Terrible on Any Day” (TOAD).

President Trump has proved to have an uncanny sense of timing and themes. Make America Great Again (MAGA) wins the theme contest moving ahead of The New Frontier and New Deal. And generally Republicans have not done well with political themes. In the case of Ronald Reagan he was the theme riding in from his ranch to catch the bad guys.

In the case of Donald Trump his political life began on an escalator not a horse or maybe as the all-knowing judge of talent on The Apprentice. Regardless, he is in his second term—as politics go that is a winner. And now the Democrats are trying to figure out their future.

Had I engaged in this kind of urine contest both my grandparents and parents would have sent me to my room. I use this generational reference point as both Trump and Musk are acting like how Trump is said to have characterized Musk (50% genius and 50% boy). Both are acting like teenage boys.

My difficulty with the Trump/Musk partnership is simple: conflict of interest. It is said that Musk has given Trump something over $250 million to chase his political ambitions, and some of Musk’s businesses’ biggest clients are government agencies.

As I type, people who make money writing columns and the like are choosing winners and losers in this contest of invectives. Let me join in. The loser is the United States of America and its position in the world. We are making democracy look like a fractious car auction.

But of course, the game is which of the two will come out better. The overwhelming answer is Trump. Certainly, Musk has a lot to lose. For example his Tesla stock lost 14% of its value on Thursday. Although it appears by the end of Friday’s trading day that most, if not all, of the loss will be recovered. Reuters attributes the bounce back to the cooling of the dispute.

Indeed, maybe that is a useful measure—the market value of a stock. Or the polling numbers of a politician. Maybe that is where our democracy is at the current moment.

So here is my short-term take. Musk is the loser as his favored status as a businessman close to the President has taken a hit. The President in that limited sense comes out better but as time goes on maybe he loses support as a percentage of supporters wonder about his judgment in letting Musk roam through the White House as if he was the First Lady.

Back ever so briefly to Secretary Malcolm Baldrige. He would be aghast; he was a real patriot.

Al Sikes is the former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission under George H.W. Bush. Al writes on themes from his book, Culture Leads Leaders Follow published by Koehler Books. 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Al

From and Fuller: The GOP Senate’s Big Beautiful Problem and Elon Musk Leaves the Building

June 5, 2025 by Al From and Craig Fuller
Leave a Comment

Every Thursday, the Spy hosts a conversation with Al From and Craig Fuller on the most topical political news of the moment.

This week, From and Fuller discuss whether the Republican-controlled Senate will have at least four members willing to vote against the Trump-backed spending and tax bill, which is projected to increase the country’s debt by trillions and reduce social safety net federal programs. Al and Craig also share their thoughts on the end of Elon Musk’s tenure in the Trump White House.

And during the Spy’s only fundraising drive this year, Craig asks viewers to support local journalism on the Mid-Shore. Donations can be made here.

This video podcast is approximately sixteen minutes in length.

To listen to the audio podcast version, please use this link:

Background

While the Spy’s public affairs mission has always been hyper-local, it has never limited us from covering national, or even international issues, that impact the communities we serve. With that in mind, we were delighted that Al From and Craig Fuller, both highly respected Washington insiders, have agreed to a new Spy video project called “The Analysis of From and Fuller” over the next year.

The Spy and our region are very lucky to have such an accomplished duo volunteer for this experiment. While one is a devoted Democrat and the other a lifetime Republican, both had long careers that sought out the middle ground of the American political spectrum.

Al From, the genius behind the Democratic Leadership Council’s moderate agenda which would eventually lead to the election of Bill Clinton, has never compromised from this middle-of-the-road philosophy. This did not go unnoticed in a party that was moving quickly to the left in the 1980s. Including progressive Howard Dean saying that From’s DLC was the Republican wing of the Democratic Party.

From’s boss, Bill Clinton, had a different perspective. He said it would be hard to think of a single American citizen who, as a private citizen, has had a more positive impact on the progress of American life in the last 25 years than Al From.”

Al now lives in Annapolis and spends his semi-retirement as a board member of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University (his alma mater) and authoring New Democrats and the Return to Power. He also is an adjunct faculty member at Johns Hopkins’ Krieger School and recently agreed to serve on the Annapolis Spy’s Board of Visitors. He is the author of “New Democrats and the Return to Power.”

For Craig Fuller, his moderation in the Republican party was a rare phenomenon. With deep roots in California’s GOP culture of centralism, Fuller, starting with a long history with Ronald Reagan, leading to his appointment as Reagan’s cabinet secretary at the White House, and later as George Bush’s chief-of-staff and presidential campaign manager was known for his instincts to find the middle ground. Even more noted was his reputation of being a nice guy in Washington, a rare characteristic for a successful tenure in the White House.

Craig has called Easton his permanent home for the last eight years, where he now chairs the board of the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum and is a former board member of the Academy Art Museum and Benedictine.  He also serves on the Spy’s Board of Visitors and writes an e-newsletter available by clicking on DECADE SEVEN.

With their rich experience and long history of friendship, now joined by their love of the Chesapeake Bay, they have agreed through the magic of Zoom, to talk inside politics and policy with the Spy every Thursday.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: From and Fuller, Spy Highlights

Messy By Angela Rieck

June 5, 2025 by Angela Rieck
Leave a Comment

I am a bit of a clean freak. I keep my home relatively pristine.

Nevertheless, I recognize that the best things in life are messy. Families are messy. Relationships are messy. Friends are messy. Children are messy. Dogs are messy. Gardens are messy. Boats are messy. Basically, everything that matters is usually messy

I suspect that part of my cleanliness is a way of keeping some order in the messiness in my life. Cleanliness is something that I can control. 

But a messy life a happy life. 

I host a Gingerbread House party every year after Thanksgiving. With my large family, anywhere from 15 to 20 children and adults arrive to decorate Christmas gingerbread houses, all at once. It is mayhem. Some of the decorators are children and when they are done, there is candy everywhere. Fortunately, my daughter and her husband have assumed the bulk of the cleaning duties.

Even after the cleaning, the house is messy. For weeks, I find candy in all kinds of places, wiping off icing in areas that I didn’t know children could reach. And I love it. I enjoy watching the kids eat the candies that they put on the gingerbread houses. I love their inspired creations. One time, one of my grand nephews selected a Gingerbread house that had been damaged. It had a hole in the roof, so he made the hole bigger and filled it with candy so that he could use the gingerbread house as a candy jar. 

The adults (my nieces and nephews) are just as amusing, sometimes competitive, but the results are festive and beautiful. At the end, we award prizes to the children. And it just so happens that all the children end up winning some kind of prize. Some examples of prizes are houses with the most green candies, or the house with the most candy (you get the picture). It is a lot of fun. And it is as messy as messy gets.

Friend relationships can be messy, and it takes persistence to maintain them. But they wouldn’t be as strong if they weren’t messy. Spousal relationships are particularly messy and just like friendships it takes persistence to get through the down-periods and to enjoy the good periods without resentment from the down times. My dogs are messy, tracking in all kinds of dirt. My garden is messy, thanks the weeds and the bunnies.

And family, that can be the messiest of all. But family, when you accept the messiness, are there for you for life. 

So, a messy life is a complicated life. But I know for those of us who are blessed with children, grandchildren, spouses, friends, dogs, gardens and all manner of hobbies, we would not trade that messiness for anything in the world.


Angela Rieck, a Caroline County native, received her PhD in Mathematical Psychology from the University of Maryland and worked as a scientist at Bell Labs, and other high-tech companies in New Jersey before retiring as a corporate executive. Angela and her dogs divide their time between St Michaels and Key West Florida. Her daughter lives and works in New York City.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Angela

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 186
  • Next Page »

Wash College

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Cambridge
  • Commerce
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Food & Garden
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • News
  • Point of View
  • Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Contact Us
  • COVID-19: Resources and Data

© 2025 Spy Community Media. | Log in