MENU

Sections

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
November 9, 2025

Cambridge Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Cambridge

  • About Us
    • Editors and Writers
    • Sponsorship Terms & Conditions
    • Code of Ethics
    • Sign Up for Cambridge Spy Daily Email Blast
  • The Arts and Design
  • Culture and Local Life
  • Food & Garden
  • Public Affairs
    • Commerce
    • Health
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Senior Nation
  • Point of View
  • Chestertown Spy
  • Talbot Spy
3 Top Story

Looking at the Masters: William Hogarth

October 29, 2020 by Beverly Hall Smith
Leave a Comment

 William Hogarth was born and raised in London’s East End, a poor and rough part of London.  His father was a failed Latin school master and writer who also failed at his other pursuits and spent four years in Fleet Prison for debtors. Hogarth and his mother had to hold the family together.  At sixteen Hogarth was apprenticed to a goldsmith and was able to engrave images on coats of arm and booksellers plates.  His drawing and engraving skills developed quickly.  He was able to transition to making prints, and in 1720 he set up his own print shop.  Hogarth’s knowledge of art came from his extensive study of European prints.  He began attending drawing classes in 1724 at St. Martin’s Lane school in the home of Sir James Thornhill.  Five years later he eloped with Thornhill’s daughter Jane.   Theirs was a happy marriage, but they had no children. 

Outgoing and personable, Hogarth enjoyed the social and intellectual life of London.  His good friends included writers, musicians, liberal intellectuals, and actors.  Among them was David Garrick, the famous actor, playwright, and theater manger of the Drury Lane Theatre. However, Hogarth’s childhood experiences and the struggles of the poor never left him.  He walked the London streets observing and remembering everything.  He told of his unique skill of “retaining in my mind’s eye without drawing on the spot whatever I wanted to imitate.” Hogarth knew the low life and the high society of London. His art, whether painting or prints, was satirical, comical, and critical of the morals of his time.

Hogarth not only was a portrait painter and printmaker but also was an extremely creative writer.  He had much in common with English writers such as Samuel Johnson, Henry Fielding, Daniel Defoe, and Jonathon Swift; and he was a precursor to Charles Dickens.  He is famous for his paintings that tell moral stories which he wrote. In “A Harlot’s Progress” (1730) (six paintings), Moll/Mary Hackabout, an innocent young country girl, comes to London looking for honest work and eventually ends up as a prostitute. “The Rakes Progress” (1731)(8 paintings) , tells of Tom Rakekwell,  the handsome and lazy son of a rich merchant, who eventually looses all his money through gambling and other pursuits of pleasure and ends up in Bedlam, the insane asylum.  As a result of the popularity of these paintings, Hogarth engraved them, thereby increasing their popularity by making them cheaper and readily available for sale.

“An Election Entertainment” (plate 1)

Hogarth’s “Humours of an Election” (1754-55) (40’’ x 50”) (4 paintings), was inspired by a local election in 1754 for a seat in Parliament in Oxfordshire. The race was between the conservative Tory and the liberal Whig parties, and was a popular topic of discussion in London newspapers, broadsheets, coffee houses, and bars. With the exception of a few historical references, Hogarth does not satirize specific people and events from the Oxfordshire election.  Instead he sets the scenes in the imaginary town of Guzzledown, and he creates a host of both comic and satirical characters to illustrate vices such as bribery, intimidation, and mayhem, all widely associated with corruption in British elections.  

“An Election Entertainment” (plate 1) depicts Whig party candidates on the left of a large table stretching horizontally across the room. The Mayor of Guzzledown is on the right. The horizontal table was intended to remind the viewer of da Vinci’s “Last Supper” and to make an obvious comparison and contrast. The Whig candidates, on the left, are putting up with unwanted attention from their constituents.  The younger Whig candidate, blue coated and wearing the white wig, is tolerating the kiss of a large, ugly and possibly pregnant woman named Doll Tearsheet.  A small child holds onto his hand and is stealing his ring, while a man standing behind him is trying to light his wig on fire. Seated next to him at the table, the other candidate in the grey wig and dark green coat is being hugged and breathed on by two old and probably drunken men. 

An orange Tory campaign banner behind the Whig candidates declares “Liberty and Loyalty.”  It has been stolen from the protestors outside. Various and sundry characters crowd the room talking, eating, and drinking.  It is Hogarth at his best, and may remind the viewer of the bar scene in “Star Wars.” A small group of musicians in the center behind the table provide the entertainment.  On the wall above them a painting of a royal has been slashed.  

Outside the back window, and unfortunately hard for the viewer to see, an anti-Semitic Tory mob is carrying the effigy of a bearded Jew, labeled No Jews.  The Whig government had recently passed a law allowing greater freedom for Jews that was unpopular with the Tories. The mob also carries bricks and staves which they throw through the window at the Whigs inside, and a few men inside throw furniture out the window at them. They carry two banners:  “Liberty” and “Give us our Eleven Days.”  This second banner refers to the adoption in 1752 of the Gregorian calendar which resulted on September 3, 1752, becoming officially September 14, 1752.  They lost eleven days of their lives. 

At the far right of the table, the town Major has become sick from over indulging in oysters. He is being bled as a cure. In the lower right hand corner, one of the bricks thrown from outside has hit the election agent attired in dark red, in the head; he has dropped his registry book and turned over a wine bottle. At front center another injured man is being treated by someone poring gin over his wound.  In front a young boy makes punch in a barrel.  There is always much left to discover in Hogarth’s works. This piece is the most discussed from the “The Election” series.  

“Canvassing for the Vote” (plate 2)

Set outside of the Royal Oak Inn, which serves as Tory headquarters, “Canvassing for the Vote” (plate2) depicts both Whigs and Tories engaging in bribing, coercing and otherwise doing whatever it takes to get votes. Centered in the composition is the skeptical inn keeper being plied with money from both Whig and Tory. His hands are out of sight as he accepts money from each. Above his head is the inn’s sign, a gold framed sign depicting a Royal Oak and mostly covered by a temporary sign making fun of the Whigs.  Punch, a character from the commedia dell’arte, pushes a wheelbarrow full of coins that he tosses to a crowd, one member of which looks like a witch.  Next to them a Tory looks up and flirts with two young ladies on a balcony.  Is he interested in votes or something else?  Outside the door of the Inn, a large carved British lion eats a French fleur-de-lis.  A soldier looks out the door. The military does not take sides in elections. To the two men at the right side of the painting are identified as sailors. They are smoking and playing a game with tiles. The distant scene on the right has been described as an anti-Semitic crowd.

“The Polling”   (plate 3)

In “The Polling” (plate 3) voters are lining up to cast their vote. On a porch the Whig party sits behind an orange flag and the Tories behind a blue flag.  One must go up the steps to the porch to vote. On the right side, a peg legged Whig voter is trying to vote by putting has hook on the book as he swears to his identity.  His right to vote is being challenged; as the law says he must put his hand on the book to swear the oath, the metal hook is being questioned.  Next to him, the Tories are bringing a mentally disturbed man to vote. Next in line, the Whig’s are bringing a dead man in his shroud to vote. In the background a carriage with the seal of Britannia on the door has broken down.  The lady inside is furious.  Oblivious to everything, the coach drivers are playing cards. This image has been interpreted as “emphasizing the message that political negligence and mismanagement have imperiled the nation.”

“Chairing the Member” (plate 4)

The Tories have won and they are pursuing the British tradition of “Chairing the Member” (plate 4).  A parade of supporters follows behind the chair and others are feasting and celebrating in the building at the left.  Unfortunately the new member is about to fall from the chair as the group encounters a pitched battle between a Tory supporter in the white shirt fighting with a Whig supporter with an orange cockade on his hat. The Whig is holding a chain attached to a black bear ridden by a monkey. Also blocking the path to the gate is a donkey laden with barrels.  On top of the wall leading to the gate of the church, two chimney sweeps urinate on the monkey and the bear. The decorative sculpture usually found on top of a gate post is a skull and crossbones.  Leading this strange group is a blind fiddler.  The blind leading the blind is the obvious reference.

At the bottom left of this unique group, a sow and three piglets race across a brick bridge. This image has been recognized as referencing the miracle of the Gadarene swine from Matthew 8:28.  Jesus and his disciples encounter half naked men who were possessed by demons.  Jesus exorcises the demons, turning the men into swine at their request and they “ran violently down a steep place into the sea where they perished in the water.” Gadarene is defined as involving or engaging in a headlong or potentially disastrous rush to something.  To complete the chaotic scene a goose flies directly over head of the new member. Is the goose cackling?  In each scene in the series much is going on and there are clearly many references to circumstances of the times.  The viewer does not need to understand Hogarth’s references to enjoy and appreciate his overall message.  Hogarth’s works have been called modern moral subjects.

Often the center of controversy for obvious reasons, Hogarth pointed out problems and issues many would have preferred hidden.  Hogarth also was a compassionate and concerned citizen. He brought to Parliament the issue of copyright.  His prints were so popular they were being duplicated without his permission. The copyright law, called the Hogarth Act was passed in 1735. Yes, it protected his earnings but also benefited all artists.  He followed in the footsteps of his first art teacher and established the St. Martin’s Lane Academy.  It was one of the precursors to the Royal Academy. 

Hogarth’s portrait of “Captain Coram” (1740) was celebrated in London as Coram was a noted philanthropist and founder of the Foundling Hospital in London.  Hogarth was active in contributing to and promoting the hospital.  When the building was completed in 1745, he persuaded a group of fellow artists to contribute paintings with uplifting subjects to decorate the building.  This collection of paintings was the first public exhibition of contemporary art in London and proved to be a major step toward the founding of London’s Royal Academy of Art in 1768.  

Beverly Hall Smith was a professor of art history for 40 years.  Since retiring with her husband Kurt to Chestertown six years ago, she has taught art history classes at WC-ALL and Chesapeake College’s Institute for Adult Learning.  She is also an artist whose work is sometimes in exhibitions at Chestertown RiverArts and she paints sets for the Garfield Center for the Arts.

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

Looking at the Masters: Jacques Louis David

October 22, 2020 by Beverly Hall Smith
Leave a Comment

Jacques Louis David lived and worked in interesting times in Paris.  In 1748, the year of his birth, archeologists discovered the ancient Roman ruins of Pompeii and Herculaneum that initiated a new interest in everything Greco-Roman. In 1775, the well known German historian Johann Joachim Winckelmann published Reflections on the Imitation of Greek Art, a must reading at the time. In 1776, the American Revolution, aided by the French, came to a victorious conclusion. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette ruled France from 1793 until the French Revolution in 1789, and Napoleon Bonaparte arrived on the scene from 1799 until 1814.  These historical events were consistently intertwined with the life and art of David. 

As a young man David was taught by well known and respected Parisian artists.  He enrolled in the Royal Academy in 1766.  He was talented and ambitious. His student paintings were accepted into the juried Academy Salons.  He won the prestigious Prix de Rome in 1775; entitling him to live, learn, and work in Rome at the expense of the Academy.  Having decided precisely what he wanted to get out of the experience and what he thought it was important to paint, he wrote, “The art of antiquity will not seduce me, for it lacks liveliness.” He was young and he was wrong.  After visiting Herculaneum, the Greek temple at Paestum and the Pompeii frescoes in Naples, he was hooked.  He later said he felt as if he had just been “operated on for cataract of the eye.”

“Oath of the Horatii” (1784-85)

He embarked on a series of paintings inspired by ancient Greek and Roman texts. David’s breakthrough painting was the very large “Oath of the Horatii” (1784-85) (10’8’’ x 14’).  With this painting he is credited to have initiated a new artistic style heralded as Neo-Classicism.  The “Oath of the Horatii,” first exhibited in his Roman studio and then in Paris, caused a sensation. David became the equivalent of a pop star. This new style signaled the end of the fantasy, frivolous, and excessively pastel Rococo style of Louis XV and Louis XVI.  Instead of lush pastel fabrics laden with bows and laces, David’s figures were dressed in plain Roman togas in strong reds and blues.  The Rococo’s endless fluffy green gardens with frolicking cherubs and feathery landscapes were replaced by grey stone columns supporting three Roman arches that enclose the scene.  A strong light source from the left highlights three groups of figures in the front of the composition and casts the arched background in dark shadow.  Everything is solid, steady, and clearly defined.

The inspiration for the painting came initially from a recent French tragedy about ancient Rome by Corneille, but was itself derived from the Roman historian Livy’s book From the Founding of the City, that covered the period of 753 BCE to Augustus in 14 CE.  A war between the city of Rome and the neighboring city of Alba Longa was going to be fought, however, it was decided not to fight a battle between the two armies, but between the three sons of the Horatii representing Rome and the three sons of the Curatii of Alba Longa.  Many lives would be saved as a result. Centered in the painting is the father of the Horatii who stands in a stable triangular pose and holds up the swords of his three sons.  They raise their arms and pledge their lives to fight and die for Rome. The sons are fully dressed in armor and are placed side by side in a strong triangle configuration.  These two groups are each placed in front of a dark background arch.  The light shines on the son’s backs, casting their fronts and faces in shadow, but their arms in pledge are well lighted as they reach upward to their swords.  Symbolically, the three swords in their father’s hands are the central focus of the composition, not the sons or the father.

The third grouping in the composition is composed of the mother, daughters, wives, and children of the men.  Their poses sink lower than the men and are composed in soft curves, rather than straight lines. They weep for their men.  David has placed them in accordance with the thinking of the time.  The men are in strong light, standing in straight line poses representing their courage, intelligence, patriotism, and reason. They know where their duty lies, even to their death for their city.  The women represent the opposite of reason, emotion. They weep and swoon.  They can exhibit their emotions, and will stay home to care for the children and the wounded, and mourn the dead.  The battle will be won by the Horatii who will survive.  The Curatii triplets will die, and peace will be restored.  To contemporary French intellectuals, reason and patriotism, lacking in their King and government, had prevailed. The majority of the people’s lives had been saved. 

“Death of Socrates” (1787)

The “Oath of the Horatii” was not only hailed as a new style for the Academy, it also was seen as a call for the men of France to behave with honor, courage, and reason against the weak and increasingly ineptitude of Louis XVI’s government.   David followed in 1787 with the “Death of Socrates,” referencing Greek history. The Neo-Classical style is repeated with the main figures placed along the foreground of the painting, similar to a carved Greek or Roman frieze.  The setting, costumes, and furniture are Roman.  Socrates was considered a founder of Western philosophy and practiced, taught, and wrote about ethics, moral concepts of goodness, and justice. He was called a “gadfly’ by the ruling class of a declining and failing Athenian democracy. He was arrested under false pretense, tried, and found guilty of corrupting the minds of youth and not believing in the gods.  Socrates was sentenced to death by drinking poison.  Drinking the hemlock was seen as another example of male courage, determination, and strength. Socrates took his own life to prevent further disruption to the lives of the Athenians caused by his teachings.

“The Lictors bring to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons” (1789)

 

When “The Lictors bring to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons” (1789) (127’’ x 166’’) was exhibited in the Salon in 1789, there was no doubt about the Roman subject of the painting and what is meant.  Brutus was the Roman consul; and his sons had tried to overthrow him and were caught.  The punishment for this treason was death, but Brutus had to issue the order.  He upheld the law.  It was his duty even though it meant his son’s lives.  In the painting, his sons have been executed and their bodies brought home for burial.  David continues in the Neo-Classical style with the Roman settings, costumes, and furniture.  However, he has placed Brutus in the shadow.  Having done his duty, he can now mourn his sons and show emotion, but not in public, not in the light.  In this work the emotional women were spotlighted.  

The intellectuals, the opposition, and David understood that this painting was specifically targeted at Louis XVI.  Brutus was strength and Louis was weakness.  Ironically, Louis did not get the point and purchased it for his collection.  An even greater irony, David would be allied with Robespierre, the first leader of the Revolution, and was a member of the Convention that signed Louis’s death warrant.  David also made the famous sketch of Marie Antoinette on the way to the guillotine.  Also of note, this painting started a fashion trend.  Men cut their hair short, women dressed in Roman togas and had Roman hairstyles, and Roman style furniture was seen in French houses.

“Tennis Court Oath” (1791)

   

Unable to solve the extreme financial distress of the French Government caused his predecessor Louis XV, Louis XVI called the national assembly, the Estates General, to meet at Versailles.  It had not been called since 1614. The three estates were the nobles, clergy, and commoners. David was commissioned by the Society of Friends of the Constitution representing the Third Estate (commoners) to paint this event.  On June 20, 1789, although they represented 98% of the population, the Third Estate was locked out of the larger meeting. They moved to the royal indoor tennis court and took the famous oath never to separate until establishing a new written constitution.  Louis XVI agreed to the constitution, but he soon reneged on the agreement.  On July 14, 1789, the Bastille was stormed and the French revolution began.

David’s drawing was eventually to be made into a painting, but the funds were not available.  Prints were made and sold, but the painting was not made. Under the first revolutionary government of the Jacobins, headed by Robespierre, David was elected to the National Convention in 1792.   He became minister of arts. He dismantled the Academy, opened the Louvre as a museum, and designed uniforms for the elaborate Jacobin ceremonies.  To the members of the National Convention Robespierre was the leader, but David was nicknamed the “Robespierre of the brush.”

“Intervention of the Sabines” (1799)

Jacobin leader Marat was assassinated in 1793, and Robespierre was arrested and beheaded in 1794.  David was imprisoned in the Luxembourg Palace, but he was allowed to paint.  Granted amnesty in 1795, he continued to paint and to teach.  The revolutionary governments continued to change hands and blood continued to flow.  David painted the “Intervention of the Sabines” (1799) (12’ 8’’ x 17’2’’) to celebrate his wife’s loyalty to him and to influence the current government.  At the founding of Rome, Romulus and his men needed women to populate and grow the city.  They raided and abducted women from the surrounding areas.  Several years later the Sabine men attacked Rome in revenge. David depicts the Sabine woman, showing their courage and determination in placing themselves and their children between to two armies to stop the slaughter.  After marriages and births, the two armies were now related as fathers-in-law and sons- in-law, and the bloodshed needed to end.  The women succeeded and the battle ceased. The two sides became one. 

One last political intervention in David’s life and art was the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte from 1799 until 1814.  General Napoleon followed Roman military history and saw David’s paintings as representing the Roman style government he wished to impose.  Napoleon became King and France and David became First Painter to the King.  He and his students chronicled the rise of Napoleon and his exploits as conqueror.  David and his students became propagandists for Napoleon.  In “Napoleon Crossing the Alps” (1801-05), which he did on the back of a donkey, the flamboyant General is astride a rearing stallion.  It was one of five David painted.  In 1808, David painted the enormous “The Coronation of the Emperor Napoleon I and the Crowing of the Empress Josephine in Notre Dame Cathedral on December 2, 1804 “(1808) (20.8’ x 32.1’), more simply known as “Le Sacre.”  It depicts Napoleon’s self-elevation from King of France to Emperor, the title indicating his intention to conquer and rule all of Europe.  In the ceremony, a standing Napoleon took the crown from the hands of the Pope and placed it on his own head.  He would not bow to anyone, and no one but himself could grant him the crown. In the painting Napoleon commissioned from David, Napoleon already wears the Emperors crown, and he is crowning his wife Empress. Napoleon said he would not be depicted on his knees to anyone. Napoleon also insisted all the attendees be depicted and all of those were to be portraits. They were.  On view in the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC, is David’s “Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries” (1812).  

When Napoleon fell in 1814, so did David.  He was exiled to Brussels where he continued to paint until his death in 1825.  Although the governments changed and French art styles would go through many changes, David was held in high esteem by the Academy and artists. In 1860 the famous French painter Delacroix called David “the father of the whole modern school.”

“History repeats itself, but in such cunning disguise that we never detect the resemblance until the damage is done.”  Sydney J. Harris [20th century American journalist, Chicago Daily News and Chicago Sun Times]

Beverly Hall Smith was a professor of art history for 40 years.  Since retiring with her husband Kurt to Chestertown six years ago, she has taught art history classes at WC-ALL and Chesapeake College’s Institute for Adult Learning.  She is also an artist whose work is sometimes in exhibitions at Chestertown RiverArts and she paints sets for the Garfield Center for the Arts.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Arts Portal Lead

Looking at the Masters: Aurora Robson

October 15, 2020 by Beverly Hall Smith
Leave a Comment

Aurora Robson was born in Toronto, grew up in Hawaii, and now lives and works in New York City..  Her parents were “Hippies” and her childhood was a bit unsettled. She liked to paint and supported herself at fifteen by painting murals in restaurants.  In 1998 she went to live with her brother in Seattle.  He had opened a gallery, and she learned to weld in order to help him with his art.  She returned to New York City in 1990, and without a high school degree, she passed the exam for admission to Columbia University. Two years later she completed her BA degree in Visual Arts and Art History, magna cum laude.  She became a certified master welder, opened her own welding studio in New York and became special events director for MTV.  She made things for them that were used and then thrown away.  She quit.

An eco-activist, Robson creates art from that which is thrown away.  “Every choice we make has consequences for the environment.  The more I learn about plastic pollution, the more motivated I am to do something about it.  Art is a global language, and pollution is a global issue, so merging the two to find potential solutions…” became her motivating force. Her first images were derived from childhood dreams and nightmares, and were intended to take something with a negative impact and turn it into something positive.  Her media was plastic bottles collected from the trash. Her first works were two-dimensional and hard to see.  In 2003 she realized, “Maybe I should see if I could make the nightmares three-dimensional.” Her decision to use plastic bottles was confirmed in 2008, after learning about the Great Pacific Garbage Dump, which is thought to be larger in area than the United States.

“Lift” (2010)

“Lift” (2010) is an installation at the Gibbs Recreation and Wellness Center at Rice University in Houston, Texas.  The work has a solar powered motor that makes it rotate, and it is composed of 10,000 discarded plastic bottles and 3,000 bottle caps.  “Lift” is about 13 feet round, painted in a variety of yellows and greens, and hangs from the ceiling like a radiant sun.  Robson often employs local groups of students and engages homeless people to collect bottles.  She pays more than the deposit. “I choose the materials I use to work with usually because they’re things that people don’t care about, and I really like the challenge of taking objects that are considered useless or without potential and transforming them in such a way that they fulfill some of their potential.”

Always conscious of the environment, she stopped using toxic adhesive glues.  Most of work is colorfully painted and she uses non- toxic paint.  Already a master welder she changed to aluminum rivets as they were less toxic; now there is an industrial plastic welder, that heats to melting but not burning.  Serrated, spring-based scissors make it easier to cut large amounts of plastic.  The bottles also need to be well cleaned.  In most instances environmentally conscious groups are enlisted as participants to gather bottles and to share in and learn from the experience. 

Robson started a website as soon as she began making art full time: “It has been the easiest way to introduce people to my work around the world.  It has provided me with a diverse audience, a growing collector base, a great deal of publicity, and an effective platform for communicating my ideas.  I love the internet.”  She also generously shares her processes to encourage other artists to recycle.

“Be Like Water” (2010)

Robson’s participation in one-person and group exhibitions is extensive, but she receives commissions involving large permanent or semi-permanent installations.  “Be Like Water” (2010) (25’ tall, 120’ long, 14’ wide) was funded by the City of Philadelphia’s Department of Cultural Affairs and several galleries.  Seven public and private schools in Philadelphia collected the 80,000 plastic bottle caps and 9000 plastic bottles.  Instead of painting the bottles in bright color, her usual practice, she leaves these bottles either clear or white.  They are hung suspended from the ceiling of the large center hall of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.  “Be Like Water” generates a magical environment and calls to mind a myriad of images such as a majestic water fall, a star cluster, or even a spectral image.  Robson often comments on her work and use of plastic with water related terms: “Plastic is so malleable, you can do just about anything with, transforming something that already exists, rather than creating something additional, effectively restructuring the flow…mobility and flexibility are keys to getting through any kind of obstacle, be it mental, physical, or spiritual.  I try to be like water.”

“Dyno” (2015)

 “Dyno” (2015) (11’x6’x5’), a permanent work commissioned by Kingbrae Garden, New Brunswick, Canada, is fun. Robson conceived and constructed the piece during a month long residency in New Brunswick.  Fishing is a major industry in New Brunswick, and “Dyno” is entirely composed of plastic boxes used to transport the fish. The boxes are not recyclable.  Robson comments, “Dyno is a meditation of the dynamic and mutable nature of things.  For example, a glass of water may become part of a cloud over time, or a piece of problematic piece of plastic waste may become a piece of “sustainable art.”  If the viewer could look closely at the work, the embossed company name DYNO remains visible on several pieces.  Creating a dinosaur from plastic boxes labeled DYNO was certainly a fun and totally apt decision, even though the funky blue color does not scream dinosaur.   It is worth noting that the DYNO Company no longer exists. 

“Troika” (2015)

 “Troika” (2015) (approximately 108’’x112’x120’’) is part of the exhibition Gravity Schmavity, and another example of the malleability of plastic and the creative talents of Robson.  Commissioned for the Arboretum at Penn State University, University Park, both the works’ names and the images are delightful. “Troika” is composed of 9,214 tons of garbage that is 62% of the Penn State’s total waste stream, and was either recycled or composted.  A second work in the glass house at the Arboretum is called “Ding Dang” (2017) (108’’x108’’x 40’’).  

Robson’s work was discussed in The Environmental Magazine, January 20, 2011. Robson creates approximately 20 green jobs with each large scale project.  If a project is temporary and to be destroyed, the pieces are delivered to a recycling company that can recycle the specific objects.  Robson notes, “The vast majority of them [plastics] have way more structural integrity than s necessary. There is no reason to make bottles this strong.  As far as I’m concerned, the word “disposable” should be struck from the human vocabulary.  Every piece of plastic that’s ever been created still exists! It goes inside fishes’ bellies and then we eat fish, and we’re like, “Why are cancer rates going up?”

In 2008 Robson founded Project Vortex, an organization of international artists, scientists, designers, architects and manufacturers who “are actively intercepting the plastic waste stream as part of our independent practices.  This is a constantly expanding network. Plastic is designed with archival integrity so it makes an excellent medium for a vast number of creative applications.” Project Vortex continues today and has over 50 members.  On the web-site, works by the artists are for sale at reasonable prices with part of the profits going to environmental causes.  

In recognition of her artistic talent, Robson was awarded the Pollock-Krasner Foundation grant and the New York Foundation for the Arts Fellowship in 2009.  Robson was invited in 2010 to teach a course titled “Sculpture + Intercepting the Waste Stream” at Mary Baldwin University in Staunton, Virginia.  Several universities have had her teach the course, and “each time with astoundingly positive result.”  In 2013 Robson delivered the TED talk, “Trash+Love.”

Robson receives a continuous stream of invitations for one-person exhibitions and commissions.  In the last few years they include “Arise” (2017), commissioned by the Lauritzen Gardens of Omaha, Nebraska; 30 sculptures for the gardens at the Orange County Arts Council of New York; and “The Tide is High” from the exhibition Sea Change (2017), commissioned by the Halsey Institute for Contemporary Art in South Carolina.  

In 2019 the Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas commissioned Robson to create a sculpture of plastic straws which had been banned from use.  The 25 foot tall sculpture will be composed of 20 million straws repurposed by Robson.  Locally, Incidental Monuments, Designing with Discards was exhibited in early 2020 at the Silber Gallery at Goucher College.  

Robson is aware of the irony implication of her work.   In her TED talk she states, “The Mac Arthur Foundation recently released a study projecting that by 2050, there will be more plastic than fish in our oceans.” She knows her plastic sculptures could easily last for a 100 to 1000 years of more, but at least they have a “beautiful purpose, and don’t have to go through the costly recycling process…Image there are no more plastic bottled for me to work with.  That would be amazing! I would have to find another way to interrupt the waste stream to make my work…One can always dream.”

Beverly Hall Smith was a professor of art history for 40 years.  Since retiring with her husband Kurt to Chestertown six years ago, she has taught art history classes at WC-ALL and Chesapeake College’s Institute for Adult Learning.  She is also an artist whose work is sometimes in exhibitions at Chestertown RiverArts and she paints sets for the Garfield Center for the Arts.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Chestertown Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Cambridge
  • Commerce
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Food & Garden
  • Health
  • Local Life
  • News
  • Point of View
  • Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Contact Us
  • COVID-19: Resources and Data

© 2025 Spy Community Media. | Log in